From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Amit Shah <amit@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qdev: Mark devices as non-hotpluggable by default
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:59:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170925175944.GD3030@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59e890ab-45e4-fe8a-a8de-3c441de19080@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:42:13PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 25.09.2017 17:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 25 September 2017 at 16:19, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Not sure whether this works for the virtio-xxx-device devices,
> >> though, since they are marked as user_creatable = true currently...
> >
> > That's deliberate -- for the arm boards with virtio-mmio
> > the board creates a bunch of virtio-mmio transports and the
> > virtio-foo-device can be user created to plug into those.
>
> Yes, I know ... I'm just wondering whether the virtio-xxx-device devices
> should be non-user_creatable on the non-ARM targets, since they
> apparently can't be used with "-device" there...?
I wouldn't like to make DeviceClass fields depend on the target.
Being user-creatable doesn't mean they will work on all machines,
anyway. If user/management need more specific info, they need
something like the query-device-slots command I've proposed some
time ago.
>
> > If overall trying to do the 'right thing' is tricky here
> > then perhaps we can start by flipping the default to
> > not-hotpluggable and marking some devices hotpluggable
> > that in theory shouldn't be with a comment about why.
>
> Yes, if Eduardo's idea to move the test to qmp_device_add() does not
> work out (I'll try that next), your suggestion is certainly the best
> thing we can do right now.
I think it would work, but we would lose the feature Peter
mentions below:
>
> > Incidentally I think there's still some advantage in the
> > "created as part of some other device" devices having
> > to be explicitly marked hotpluggable, because those
> > devices do still need some specific code in them to
> > handle it (ie code to release the resources that are
> > created in the device's realize method).
>
> Ok ... by the way, does anybody know more devices like
> virtio-xxx-device, i.e. devices that are indirectly plugged when adding
> other devices?
"make check" found a few candidates:
https://travis-ci.org/ehabkost/qemu/jobs/278743999
Initialization of device dpcd failed: Device 'dpcd' does not support hotplugging
[...]
Initialization of device nand failed: Device 'nand' does not support hotplugging
Finding the full list of devices that can be instantiated
internally at hotplug-time sounds tricky.
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-25 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-22 9:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qdev: Mark devices as non-hotpluggable by default Thomas Huth
2017-09-22 10:13 ` David Gibson
2017-09-25 10:13 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-09-25 11:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-25 13:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-25 13:46 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-25 14:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-25 15:19 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-25 15:26 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-25 17:42 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-25 17:45 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-25 17:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-25 18:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-25 18:20 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-25 18:46 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-25 17:59 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2017-09-25 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-25 18:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-26 2:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-26 3:29 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-26 16:11 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-26 17:27 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-26 18:00 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-25 17:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-26 5:26 ` Bharata B Rao
2017-09-26 10:20 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170925175944.GD3030@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).