From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x: create a compat s390 phb for <=2.10
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:28:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170927142837.GB2108@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4681e677-9e5a-4c1c-8e22-dc5c51b7286d@redhat.com>
* David Hildenbrand (david@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 27.09.2017 12:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/27/2017 12:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:25:00 +0800
> >> Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 在 2017/9/27 下午5:47, Cornelia Huck 写道:
> >>>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:40:25 +0200
> >>>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> I'd really really really (did I mention really?) favor something like a
> >>>>> dummy device, because we could easily handle the !CONFIG_PCI case then.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All these compat options and conditions will kill us someday... we're
> >>>>> already patching around that whole stuff way too much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If we ever unconditionally created a device, we should keep doing so.
> >>>> Yes, that whole thing is horrible, especially interaction with compat
> >>>> machines.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have an idea on how to create such a dummy device (without
> >>>> having to effectively copy a lot of configured-out code)?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> How about in s390_pcihost_hot_plug() we check s390_has_feat(zpci)?
> >>> If no zpci feature, we avoid plugging any pci device.
> >>> Then we could always create phb.
> >>> I think pcibus's vmstate is only data to migrate.
> >>
> >> That's still problematic if CONFIG_PCI is off. I currently don't have a
> >> better idea than either disallowing compat machines on builds without
> >> pci, or using a dummy device...
> >
> > For this particular case your initial patch might be less problematic than
> > a dummy device, because the code that does the migration is NOT contained
> > in s390 specific code but in common PCI code instead. We would need to keep
> > the dummy device always in a way that it will work with the common PCI
> > code.
> >
>
> Interesting, so how is migration then handled for e.g. x86 or other
> architectures that can work without CONFIG_PCI? I assume their migration
> should also break?
It's tied to machine-type; the x86 i440fx and q35 machine types have
PCI; you can't disable PCI while still having those machine types.
(I don't know if you can disable PCI at all on x86)
Dave
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-27 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-26 16:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] s390x: more zpci compat fun Cornelia Huck
2017-09-26 16:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x: create a compat s390 phb for <=2.10 Cornelia Huck
2017-09-26 17:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-26 18:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 9:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-27 10:25 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-09-27 10:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-27 10:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-27 12:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 12:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-27 14:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-09-27 14:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-27 14:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-09-27 15:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-28 10:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-28 10:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-28 12:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-28 12:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-28 12:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-28 12:33 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170927142837.GB2108@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).