From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxLXc-0002Mf-Jm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:14:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxLXX-0008Lb-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:14:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 02:14:45 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170928020110-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1506049617-25716-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <513bbb2d-280b-92f8-b45f-89963f7118e2@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20170926223046-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests/boot-sector: Increase timeout to 600 seconds List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Michael Tokarev , Thomas Huth , Victor Kaplansky , QEMU Trivial , Stefan Weil , Jason Wang , QEMU Developers On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:35:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 26 September 2017 at 20:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:06:40AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> 22.09.2017 06:06, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> > If QEMU has been compiled with the flags --enable-tcg-interpreter and > >> > --enable-debug, the guest is running incredibly slow. The pxe boot test > >> > can take up to 400 seconds when testing the pseries ppc64 machine. While > >> > we should still look for ways to speed up the test on the pseries machine, > >> > it's better to increase the timeout in this test to 600 seconds anyway to > >> > allow the test to pass successfully now with this unusal configuration > >> > already. > >> > >> Applied to -trivial, thanks! > >> > >> /mjt > > > > Please do not apply this, trivial is not appropriate for functional > > changes like this. > > It's not a functional change, it's just bumping a test timeout. > If you think we should be doing something else that's fine (as > with any other patch), but in principle I think this is totally > fine as a -trivial patch. > > thanks > -- PMM OK. I'd rather not see it applied as-is though. -- MST