From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59601) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz3Uo-0002Mt-Fa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 12:23:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz3Uk-0005kR-JF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 12:23:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:22:44 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20171002162244.GH4362@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170925145526.32690-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170925145526.32690-1-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jsnow@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org List-ID: Am 25.09.2017 um 16:55 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. > > The overall conversion currently looks like: > part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged in 2.10, commit 51b0a488) > part 2: dirty-bitmap (this series, v9 was here [1]) > part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (v4 is posted [2] and is mostly reviewed) > part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [3], but needs review) > > Available as a tag at: > git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-byte-dirty-v10 Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin