From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, pkrempa@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] blockjob: expose manual-cull property
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:43:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003174305.GG4501@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84555a15-9ec6-2b28-a118-c209c97efd45@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:59:28AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2017 11:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 03/10/2017 05:15, John Snow wrote:
> >> For drive-backup and blockdev-backup, expose the manual-cull
> >> property, having it default to false. There are no universal
> >> creation parameters, so it must be added to each job type that
> >> it makes sense for individually.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > The verb "cull" is a bit weird. The only alternative that comes to mind
> > though are "reap" (like processes). There's also "join" (like threads),
> > but would imply waiting if the jobs hasn't completed yet, and we
> > probably don't want it.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
>
> Sure, open to suggestions. I think Kevin suggested "delete" which I have
> reservations about because of people potentially confusing it with
> "cancel" or "complete" -- it does not have the capacity to
> end/terminate/finish/complete/cancel a job.
>
> "reap" might be fine. I don't really have any strong preference.
>
As far as verbs go, I like both 'reap' and 'delete'. As far as the
property, naming it 'manual_verb' is a bit odd, too. Maybe a clearer term
for the property would just be 'persistent', with the QMP command being
'block_job_reap' or 'block_job_delete'?
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 3:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] blockjobs: add explicit job culling John Snow
2017-10-03 3:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] blockjob: add manual-cull property John Snow
2017-10-03 3:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] qmp: add block-job-cull command John Snow
2017-10-03 3:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] blockjob: expose manual-cull property John Snow
2017-10-03 15:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-03 15:59 ` John Snow
2017-10-03 17:43 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2017-10-04 1:32 ` John Snow
2017-10-03 9:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] blockjobs: add explicit job culling Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-10-03 14:42 ` John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171003174305.GG4501@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).