From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34549) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhZe-0007QQ-4Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 07:10:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhZZ-0007Px-5e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 07:10:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhZY-0007NS-Ua for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 07:10:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:10:35 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20171004131035.42ccafe3.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171004110109.16525-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20171004110109.16525-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x/css: fix css migration compat handling List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Halil Pasic Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:01:09 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > Commit e996583eb3 ("s390x/css: activate ChannelSubSys migration", > 2017-07-11) was supposed to enable css migration for virtio-ccw > machines starting 2.10, but it ended up effectively enabling it > only for 2.10 as the registration of the appropriate VMStateDescription > happens in ccw_machine_2_10_instance_options which does not get > called for machines more recent than 2_10. > > Let us move the corresponding chunk of code (which conditionally enables > the migration based on the value of the corresponding class property) to > a ccw_init, which is called for each virtio-ccw machine instance. s/a// > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic > Reported-by: Thomas Huth > --- > hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c > index fafbc6d4fe..3b5dfdb48d 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c > @@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine) > ret = css_create_css_image(VIRTUAL_CSSID, true); > } > assert(ret == 0); > + if (css_migration_enabled()) { > + css_register_vmstate(); > + } > > /* Create VirtIO network adapters */ > s390_create_virtio_net(BUS(css_bus), "virtio-net-ccw"); > @@ -731,9 +734,6 @@ DEFINE_CCW_MACHINE(2_11, "2.11", true); > static void ccw_machine_2_10_instance_options(MachineState *machine) > { > ccw_machine_2_11_instance_options(machine); > - if (css_migration_enabled()) { > - css_register_vmstate(); > - } > } > > static void ccw_machine_2_10_class_options(MachineClass *mc) Looks sane. Out of curiosity: Which machine types did you test migration for?