From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1yj4-0007tN-JL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:53:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1yj1-0001RA-Ez for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:53:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1yj1-0001Qv-8Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:53:51 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFFCC04AC6E for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:53:44 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20171010175344.GH3246@localhost.localdomain> References: <20171006132502.9191-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20171010134204.135a9425@nial.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171010134204.135a9425@nial.brq.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] isapc: Remove unnecessary migration compatibility code List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:42:04PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:25:02 -0300 > Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > We don't touch isapc when we change guest ABI and add new entries > > to PC_COMPAT_* or new PCMachineClass compat flags. This means > > isapc never guaranteed guest ABI and cross-QEMU-version live > > migration compatibility. There's no point in keeping code for > > kvm-pv-eoi and APIC ID compatibility in pc_init_isa(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost > Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov Thanks! Michael, do you prefer those pc*.c patches that touch only CPU-related code to go always through your tree, or can I merge them through x86-next without your Acked-by if it's appropriate? > > > --- > > hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c > > index 9ff79b1fd9..31646e63c4 100644 > > --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c > > +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c > > @@ -378,8 +378,6 @@ static void pc_compat_0_13(MachineState *machine) > > > > static void pc_init_isa(MachineState *machine) > > { > > - x86_cpu_change_kvm_default("kvm-pv-eoi", NULL); > > - enable_compat_apic_id_mode(); > > pc_init1(machine, TYPE_I440FX_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE, TYPE_I440FX_PCI_DEVICE); > > } > > > -- Eduardo