qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
	jsnow@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/24] block: Add flag to avoid wasted work in bdrv_is_allocated()
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:46:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012034720.11947-3-eblake@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012034720.11947-1-eblake@redhat.com>

Not all callers care about which BDS owns the mapping for a given
range of the file, or where the zeroes lie within that mapping.  In
particular, bdrv_is_allocated() cares more about finding the
largest run of allocated data from the guest perspective, whether
or not that data is consecutive from the host perspective, and
whether or not the data reads as zero.  Therefore, doing subsequent
refinements such as checking how much of the format-layer
allocation also satisfies BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO at the protocol layer is
wasted work - in the best case, it just costs extra CPU cycles
during a single bdrv_is_allocated(), but in the worst case, it
results in a smaller *pnum, and forces callers to iterate through
more status probes when visiting the entire file for even more
extra CPU cycles.

This patch only optimizes the block layer (no behavior change when
want_zero is true, but skip unnecessary effort when it is false).
Then when subsequent patches tweak the driver callback to be
byte-based, we can also pass this hint through to the driver.

Tweak BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData to declare arguments in parameter
order, rather than mixing things up (minimizing padding is not
necessary here).

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

---
v6: rebase to previous changes, s/mapping/need_zero/, tweak struct
layout, drop R-b
v5: tweak commit message and one comment, rebase to previous changes,
minor enough to still add R-b
v4: only context changes
v3: s/allocation/mapping/ and flip sense of bool
v2: new patch
---
 block/io.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index 51d2b219b8..0c87e9d8b3 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1749,10 +1749,11 @@ int bdrv_flush_all(void)
 typedef struct BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData {
     BlockDriverState *bs;
     BlockDriverState *base;
-    BlockDriverState **file;
+    bool want_zero;
     int64_t sector_num;
     int nb_sectors;
     int *pnum;
+    BlockDriverState **file;
     int64_t ret;
     bool done;
 } BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData;
@@ -1788,6 +1789,11 @@ int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status_from_backing(BlockDriverState *bs,
  * Drivers not implementing the functionality are assumed to not support
  * backing files, hence all their sectors are reported as allocated.
  *
+ * If 'want_zero' is true, the caller is querying for mapping purposes,
+ * and the result should include BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID and
+ * BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO where possible; otherwise, the result may omit those
+ * bits particularly if it allows for a larger value in 'pnum'.
+ *
  * If 'sector_num' is beyond the end of the disk image the return value is
  * BDRV_BLOCK_EOF and 'pnum' is set to 0.
  *
@@ -1804,6 +1810,7 @@ int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status_from_backing(BlockDriverState *bs,
  * is allocated in.
  */
 static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                                     bool want_zero,
                                                      int64_t sector_num,
                                                      int nb_sectors, int *pnum,
                                                      BlockDriverState **file)
@@ -1858,31 +1865,34 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,

     if (ret & BDRV_BLOCK_RAW) {
         assert(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID && local_file);
-        ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(local_file, ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
+        ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(local_file, want_zero,
+                                       ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
                                        *pnum, pnum, &local_file);
         goto out;
     }

     if (ret & (BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO)) {
         ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED;
-    } else {
+    } else if (want_zero) {
         if (bdrv_unallocated_blocks_are_zero(bs)) {
             ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
         } else if (bs->backing) {
             BlockDriverState *bs2 = bs->backing->bs;
             int64_t nb_sectors2 = bdrv_nb_sectors(bs2);
+
             if (nb_sectors2 >= 0 && sector_num >= nb_sectors2) {
                 ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
             }
         }
     }

-    if (local_file && local_file != bs &&
+    if (want_zero && local_file && local_file != bs &&
         (ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO) &&
         (ret & BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID)) {
         int file_pnum;

-        ret2 = bdrv_co_get_block_status(local_file, ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
+        ret2 = bdrv_co_get_block_status(local_file, want_zero,
+                                        ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
                                         *pnum, &file_pnum, NULL);
         if (ret2 >= 0) {
             /* Ignore errors.  This is just providing extra information, it
@@ -1918,6 +1928,7 @@ early_out:

 static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
         BlockDriverState *base,
+        bool want_zero,
         int64_t sector_num,
         int nb_sectors,
         int *pnum,
@@ -1929,7 +1940,8 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,

     assert(bs != base);
     for (p = bs; p != base; p = backing_bs(p)) {
-        ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(p, sector_num, nb_sectors, pnum, file);
+        ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(p, want_zero, sector_num, nb_sectors,
+                                       pnum, file);
         if (ret < 0) {
             break;
         }
@@ -1959,6 +1971,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_get_block_status_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
     BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData *data = opaque;

     data->ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status_above(data->bs, data->base,
+                                               data->want_zero,
                                                data->sector_num,
                                                data->nb_sectors,
                                                data->pnum,
@@ -1971,20 +1984,22 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_get_block_status_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
  *
  * See bdrv_co_get_block_status_above() for details.
  */
-int64_t bdrv_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
-                                    BlockDriverState *base,
-                                    int64_t sector_num,
-                                    int nb_sectors, int *pnum,
-                                    BlockDriverState **file)
+static int64_t bdrv_common_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                              BlockDriverState *base,
+                                              bool want_zero,
+                                              int64_t sector_num,
+                                              int nb_sectors, int *pnum,
+                                              BlockDriverState **file)
 {
     Coroutine *co;
     BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData data = {
         .bs = bs,
         .base = base,
-        .file = file,
+        .want_zero = want_zero,
         .sector_num = sector_num,
         .nb_sectors = nb_sectors,
         .pnum = pnum,
+        .file = file,
         .done = false,
     };

@@ -2000,6 +2015,16 @@ int64_t bdrv_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
     return data.ret;
 }

+int64_t bdrv_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                    BlockDriverState *base,
+                                    int64_t sector_num,
+                                    int nb_sectors, int *pnum,
+                                    BlockDriverState **file)
+{
+    return bdrv_common_block_status_above(bs, base, true, sector_num,
+                                          nb_sectors, pnum, file);
+}
+
 int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
                               int64_t sector_num,
                               int nb_sectors, int *pnum,
@@ -2012,15 +2037,15 @@ int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
 int coroutine_fn bdrv_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
                                    int64_t bytes, int64_t *pnum)
 {
-    int64_t sector_num = offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
-    int nb_sectors = bytes >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
     int64_t ret;
     int psectors;

     assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE));
     assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) && bytes < INT_MAX);
-    ret = bdrv_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors, &psectors,
-                                NULL);
+    ret = bdrv_common_block_status_above(bs, backing_bs(bs), false,
+                                         offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
+                                         bytes >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, &psectors,
+                                         NULL);
     if (ret < 0) {
         return ret;
     }
-- 
2.13.6

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12  3:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/24] make bdrv_get_block_status byte-based Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/24] block: Allow NULL file for bdrv_get_block_status() Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:46 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-10-12  3:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/24] block: Make bdrv_round_to_clusters() signature more useful Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/24] qcow2: Switch is_zero_sectors() to byte-based Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 05/24] block: Switch bdrv_make_zero() " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 06/24] qemu-img: Switch get_block_status() " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 07/24] block: Convert bdrv_get_block_status() to bytes Eric Blake
2017-10-20 14:31   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-10-20 15:12     ` Eric Blake
2017-10-20 15:31       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/24] block: Switch bdrv_co_get_block_status() to byte-based Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 09/24] block: Switch BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 10/24] block: Switch bdrv_common_block_status_above() " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/24] block: Switch bdrv_co_get_block_status_above() " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 12/24] block: Convert bdrv_get_block_status_above() to bytes Eric Blake
2017-10-20 15:03   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-10-20 15:22     ` Eric Blake
2017-10-20 15:34       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 13/24] qemu-img: Simplify logic in img_compare() Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 14/24] qemu-img: Speed up compare on pre-allocated larger file Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 15/24] qemu-img: Add find_nonzero() Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 16/24] qemu-img: Drop redundant error message in compare Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 17/24] qemu-img: Change check_empty_sectors() to byte-based Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 18/24] qemu-img: Change compare_sectors() to be byte-based Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 19/24] qemu-img: Change img_rebase() " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 20/24] qemu-img: Change img_compare() " Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 21/24] block: Align block status requests Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 22/24] block: Relax bdrv_aligned_preadv() assertion Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 23/24] qcow2: Relax is_zero() assertion Eric Blake
2017-10-12 13:20   ` Eric Blake
2017-10-20 15:11     ` Kevin Wolf
2017-10-20 15:32       ` Eric Blake
2017-10-12  3:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 24/24] qemu-io: Relax 'alloc' now that block-status doesn't assert Eric Blake
2017-10-20 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/24] make bdrv_get_block_status byte-based Kevin Wolf
2017-11-02 21:01   ` John Snow
2017-11-02 22:14     ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171012034720.11947-3-eblake@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).