From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54411)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1e2vDA-0008AP-MO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 04:20:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1e2vD7-0000Ss-Gt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 04:20:52 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:20:46 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20171013082046.GA2756@lemon>
References: <20171013012455.10737-1-famz@redhat.com>
	<20171013012455.10737-2-famz@redhat.com>
	<2d524426-1467-8d9b-f216-1014d5b18f00@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2d524426-1467-8d9b-f216-1014d5b18f00@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Fix scsi path
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Fri, 10/13 10:04, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13.10.2017 03:24, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 772ac209e1..da3c78df47 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ S: Supported
> >  F: include/hw/scsi/*
> >  F: include/scsi/*
> >  F: hw/scsi/*
> > -F: util/scsi*
> > +F: scsi/*
> 
> scsi/* is already covered by the new "Block SCSI subsystem" section, so
> I think you can also simply remove that line instead.

I didn't notice that section existing, should the two be merged into one?

Fam