From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2vbK-0000yB-PO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 04:45:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2vbF-0000T6-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 04:45:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:45:42 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20171013084542.GB2756@lemon> References: <20171013012455.10737-1-famz@redhat.com> <20171013012455.10737-2-famz@redhat.com> <2d524426-1467-8d9b-f216-1014d5b18f00@redhat.com> <20171013082046.GA2756@lemon> <048daae2-370a-e8cf-ef75-aee2e7a6508a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <048daae2-370a-e8cf-ef75-aee2e7a6508a@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Fix scsi path List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 10/13 10:30, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 13.10.2017 10:20, Fam Zheng wrote: > > On Fri, 10/13 10:04, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 13.10.2017 03:24, Fam Zheng wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > >>> --- > >>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >>> index 772ac209e1..da3c78df47 100644 > >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >>> @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ S: Supported > >>> F: include/hw/scsi/* > >>> F: include/scsi/* > >>> F: hw/scsi/* > >>> -F: util/scsi* > >>> +F: scsi/* > >> > >> scsi/* is already covered by the new "Block SCSI subsystem" section, so > >> I think you can also simply remove that line instead. > > > > I didn't notice that section existing, should the two be merged into one? > > I don't think so. One section is about the emulated SCSI devices, and > the other one about the SCSI block backend code, so that's two different > parts. > > Some other ideas though: > > 1) I think "include/scsi/*" should be removed from the SCSI devices > section, it is already handled in the "Block SCSI subsystem" - and > headers that are related to devices should go into include/hw/scsi/ > anyway instead. > > 2) The orphan LSI53C895A section could maybe be removed from the > MAINTAINERS file? It's of no use in its current "Orphan" state, and the > file is already covered by the generic SCSI devices section. OK, that sounds good to me. Fam