qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/event-facility: variable-length event masks
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:44:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171016154433.246fb264.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507729193-9747-1-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:39:53 -0400
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

Hey, blast from the past :)

> 
> The architecture supports masks of variable length for sclp write
> event mask. We currently only support 4 byte event masks, as that
> is what Linux uses.
> 
> Let's extend this to the maximum mask length supported by the
> architecture and return 0 to the guest for the mask bits we don't
> support in core.
> 
> Initial patch by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/event-facility.c         | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Out of curiousity: Do you have a guest that can verify this for mask
lengths != 4? Given that the guest I wrote that one for back then is
not publicly available...

> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> index 34b2faf..b0f71f4 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> @@ -259,23 +259,46 @@ out:
>      return;
>  }
>  
> +/* copy up to dst_len bytes and fill the rest of dst with zeroes */
> +static void copy_mask(uint8_t *dst, uint8_t *src, uint16_t dst_len,
> +                      uint16_t src_len)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < dst_len; i++) {
> +        dst[i] = i < src_len ? src[i] : 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static void write_event_mask(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb)
>  {
>      WriteEventMask *we_mask = (WriteEventMask *) sccb;
> +    uint16_t mask_length = be16_to_cpu(we_mask->mask_length);
> +    uint32_t tmp_mask;
>  
> -    /* Attention: We assume that Linux uses 4-byte masks, what it actually
> -       does. Architecture allows for masks of variable size, though */
> -    if (be16_to_cpu(we_mask->mask_length) != 4) {
> +    if (!mask_length || (mask_length > SCLP_EVENT_MASK_LEN_MAX)) {
>          sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_MASK_LENGTH);
>          goto out;
>      }
>  
> +    /*
> +     * Note: We currently only support masks up to 4 byte length;
> +     *       the remainder is filled up with zeroes. Linux uses
> +     *       a 4 byte mask length.
> +     */

Do you have any plans for extending this? Or is there no need?

(I have to ask those questions, as the documentation is not publicly
available...)

> +
>      /* keep track of the guest's capability masks */
> -    ef->receive_mask = be32_to_cpu(we_mask->cp_receive_mask);
> +    copy_mask((uint8_t *)&tmp_mask, WEM_CP_RECEIVE_MASK(we_mask, mask_length),
> +              sizeof(tmp_mask), mask_length);
> +    ef->receive_mask = be32_to_cpu(tmp_mask);
>  
>      /* return the SCLP's capability masks to the guest */
> -    we_mask->send_mask = cpu_to_be32(get_host_send_mask(ef));
> -    we_mask->receive_mask = cpu_to_be32(get_host_receive_mask(ef));
> +    tmp_mask = cpu_to_be32(get_host_send_mask(ef));
> +    copy_mask(WEM_RECEIVE_MASK(we_mask, mask_length), (uint8_t *)&tmp_mask,
> +              mask_length, sizeof(tmp_mask));
> +    tmp_mask = cpu_to_be32(get_host_receive_mask(ef));
> +    copy_mask(WEM_SEND_MASK(we_mask, mask_length), (uint8_t *)&tmp_mask,
> +              mask_length, sizeof(tmp_mask));
>  
>      sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_NORMAL_COMPLETION);
>  
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h b/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> index def1bb0..5119b9b 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> @@ -49,16 +49,28 @@
>  #define TYPE_SCLP_CPU_HOTPLUG "sclp-cpu-hotplug"
>  #define TYPE_SCLP_QUIESCE "sclpquiesce"
>  
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_LEN_MAX 1021
> +
>  typedef struct WriteEventMask {
>      SCCBHeader h;
>      uint16_t _reserved;
>      uint16_t mask_length;
> -    uint32_t cp_receive_mask;
> -    uint32_t cp_send_mask;
> -    uint32_t receive_mask;
> -    uint32_t send_mask;
> +    uint8_t masks[];
> +/*
> + * Layout of the masks is
> + *  uint8_t cp_receive_mask[mask_length];
> + *  uint8_t cp_send_mask[mask_length];
> + *  uint8_t receive_mask[mask_length];
> + *  uint8_t send_mask[mask_length];
> + * where 1 <= mask_length <= SCLP_EVENT_MASK_LEN_MAX
> + */
>  } QEMU_PACKED WriteEventMask;
>  
> +#define WEM_CP_RECEIVE_MASK(wem, mask_len) ((wem)->masks)
> +#define WEM_CP_SEND_MASK(wem, mask_len) ((wem)->masks + (mask_len))
> +#define WEM_RECEIVE_MASK(wem, mask_len) ((wem)->masks + 2 * (mask_len))
> +#define WEM_SEND_MASK(wem, mask_len) ((wem)->masks + 3 * (mask_len))
> +
>  typedef struct EventBufferHeader {
>      uint16_t length;
>      uint8_t  type;

Patch looks reasonable as far as I can see (the documentation issue
again...)

Did you need to change much from the original patch?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-16 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-11 13:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/event-facility: variable-length event masks Jason J. Herne
2017-10-16 13:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-10-16 17:11   ` Jason J. Herne
2017-10-17  7:56     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-16 19:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-10-17  7:57 ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171016154433.246fb264.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).