From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/tcg: LAP support using immediate TLB invalidation
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:35:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017113519.1eb78f7c.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07afc056-4a03-3644-d665-c165830776ba@redhat.com>
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:22:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 17.10.2017 10:47, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:23:56 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Details about Low-Address Protection can be found in description of
> >> patch 1 and 2. It is basically a subpage protection of the first two
> >> pages of every address space (for which it is enabled).
> >>
> >> We can achieve this by simply directly invalidating the TLB entry and
> >> therefore forcing every write accesses onto these two pages into the slow
> >> path.
> >>
> >> With this patch, I can boot Linux just fine (which uses LAP). This also
> >> makes all related kvm-unit-tests that we have pass.
> >
> > Tested with a kernel based on the s390/features branch (4.14-rc2 + s390
> > patches) and the initrd from the debian installer, had udevd shot down
> > by the oomkiller. That happened only once, so it was probably an
> > unrelated fluke, but that combination worked well before.
> >
>
> Very unlikely, on invalid programming exceptions you would get a kernel
> panic, not run oom. (not saying it isn't possible, rather that it is
> very unlikely).
That's what I thought as well.
>
> Can you reproduce with more memory? Have you enabled SMP? (little higher
> memory consumption)
SMP is on. I could not reproduce it again...
>
> I am running (almost) the same setup with 500M and haven't observed any
> such thing.
...so I think it really is an unrelated fluke (and I'll simply make the
machine a bit larger).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 20:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/tcg: LAP support using immediate TLB invalidation David Hildenbrand
2017-10-16 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] accel/tcg: allow to invalidate a write TLB entry immediately David Hildenbrand
2017-10-16 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] s390x/tcg: low-address protection support David Hildenbrand
2017-10-18 18:21 ` Thomas Huth
2017-10-18 19:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-10-19 8:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-19 15:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-10-17 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/tcg: LAP support using immediate TLB invalidation Cornelia Huck
2017-10-17 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-10-17 9:35 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-10-17 12:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-20 8:25 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171017113519.1eb78f7c.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).