From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4jeA-0004Ke-Lc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:24:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4jdx-0003VC-Uu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:24:14 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e4jdx-0003SY-Lg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:24:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9I8NtCk133162 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:23:57 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dp24hbgef-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:23:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:23:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:23:47 +0800 From: Dong Jia Shi References: <20171017140453.51099-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171017171315.7afc5a59.cohuck@redhat.com> <4ac6acdd-ccbf-3ff7-b6ec-5bdbc5456665@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ac6acdd-ccbf-3ff7-b6ec-5bdbc5456665@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20171018082347.GA5150@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] improve error handling for IO instr List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Halil Pasic Cc: Cornelia Huck , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Dong Jia Shi , Pierre Morel , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org * Halil Pasic [2017-10-17 18:19:20 +0200]: [...] > >> Testing > >> ======= > >> > >> Nothing happened since v2 except for a quick smoke test. Dong Jia gave v2 > >> a spin with a focus on vfio-ccw. @Dong Jia I would appreciate some proper > >> testing, especially regarding the changes in vfio-ccw (patch #3). > > > > Looks sane to me (if needed, I can fix up the minor things I found). > > > > In addition to some testing, I'd appreciate some review from others as > > well. > > > > Of course, I'm fine with the fixes (won't answer individually). I think > both Dong Jia and Pierre have already put enough work in this to be credited > with a tag, so I really hope they will get around to review this. I would > be especially happy with an Tested-by: Dong Jia since this series is quite > under-tested, and the changes in vfio-ccw aren't just minor. > > Of course I could come up with a test setup myself, but I hope Dong Jia > already has one, and he is certainly more involved with vfio-ccw. > Using Conny's s390-next branch + this series (#2-#7), I didn't notice any obvious problem during my fio test. So for the vfio-ccw related part: Tested-by: Dong Jia Shi [...] -- Dong Jia Shi