From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5aQN-0001pr-KO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:45:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5aQM-0002Kw-MW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:45:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:45:15 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20171020164515.GC31112@localhost.localdomain> References: <20171012034720.11947-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171012034720.11947-1-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/24] make bdrv_get_block_status byte-based List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com Am 12.10.2017 um 05:46 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. > > The overall conversion currently looks like: > part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488) > part 2: dirty-bitmap (merged, commit ca759622) > part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v5 at [1]) > part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [2], mostly reviewed, but needs rebase) Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin