From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration, xen: Fix block image lock issue on live migration
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:11:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024121140.GE1885@perard.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004130349.GB9801@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 03:03:49PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 02.10.2017 um 21:18 hat Dr. David Alan Gilbert geschrieben:
> > Adding in kwolf; it looks sane to me; Kevin?
> > If I'm reading this right, this is just after the device state save.
>
> Is this actual migration? Because the code looks more like it's copied
> and adapted from the snapshot code rather than from the actual migration
> code.
Well the Xen tool stack takes care of the migration, we only need to
save the device states from QEMU, I guess similair to a snapshot.
> If Xen doesn't use the standard mechanisms, I don't know what they need
> to do. Snapshots don't need to inactivate images, but migration does.
> Compared to the normal migration path, this looks very simplistic, so I
> wouldn't be surprised if there was more wrong than just file locking.
I realize now that if one would want to take a snapshot of a running
Xen guest, this xen-save-devices-state qmp command will be called as
well.
So I can see a few options to better handle snapshots, we could:
- Add a new parameter to xen-save-devices-state, "live_migration" which
could default to 'true' so older version of Xen will still works.
- Create a new qmp command that sole purpose is to call
bdrv_inactivate_all, I don't know what else this command would have to
do.
- or just take this patch.
Thanks.
> This looks like it could work as a hack to the problem at hand. Whether
> it is a proper solution, I can't say without investing a lot more time.
--
Anthony PERARD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 16:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration, xen: Fix block image lock issue on live migration Anthony PERARD
2017-10-02 19:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-10-04 13:03 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-10-24 12:11 ` Anthony PERARD [this message]
2017-10-03 11:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné
2017-10-03 11:47 ` Anthony PERARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024121140.GE1885@perard.uk.xensource.com \
--to=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).