From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAh8c-0003s7-GS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:56:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAh8b-0005dm-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:56:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:56:10 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20171103185610.GA3907@flamenco> References: <1509734853-3014-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1509734853-3014-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw: add .min_cpus and .default_cpus fields to machine_class List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , Thomas Huth , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Igor Mitsyanko , Alistair Francis , "Edgar E . Iglesias" , Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 14:47:33 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > diff --git a/hw/arm/xlnx-zcu102.c b/hw/arm/xlnx-zcu102.c > index e2d15a1..395d1b5 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/xlnx-zcu102.c > +++ b/hw/arm/xlnx-zcu102.c > @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ static void xlnx_ep108_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) > mc->block_default_type = IF_IDE; > mc->units_per_default_bus = 1; > mc->ignore_memory_transaction_failures = true; > + mc->max_cpus = XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_APU_CPUS + XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_RPU_CPUS; > + mc->min_cpus = XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_APU_CPUS; > + mc->default_cpus = XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_APU_CPUS; > } > > static const TypeInfo xlnx_ep108_machine_init_typeinfo = { > @@ -241,6 +244,8 @@ static void xlnx_zcu102_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) > mc->units_per_default_bus = 1; > mc->ignore_memory_transaction_failures = true; > mc->max_cpus = XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_APU_CPUS + XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_RPU_CPUS; > + mc->min_cpus = XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_APU_CPUS; > + mc->default_cpus = XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_APU_CPUS; > } Should we update max_cpus to just NUM_APU_CPUS as well for these boards? -smp 5 or 6 (NUM_APU + NUM_RPU) still gets us 4 vCPUs. I see there's code for RPU cpus but it seems disabled at compile-time at xlnx-zynqmp.c:431: DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has_rpu", XlnxZynqMPState, has_rpu, false) Or is there a run-time way to override this? Thanks, Emilio