From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBkcl-0001pC-RD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:51:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBkcj-0000mk-8t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:51:47 -0500 Received: from 3.mo4.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.57.129]:34347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBkcj-0000lR-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:51:45 -0500 Received: from player772.ha.ovh.net (b6.ovh.net [213.186.33.56]) by mo4.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BBBF04B1 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:51:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:51:36 +0100 From: Greg Kurz Message-ID: <20171106175136.705ff437@bahia> In-Reply-To: <5d67c7311aa19c9830cf4927a4e22159.squirrel@mifritscher.de> References: <20170929111323.6308-1-michael@fritscher.net> <20170929111323.6308-4-michael@fritscher.net> <20171106144422.4bda119f@bahia> <5d67c7311aa19c9830cf4927a4e22159.squirrel@mifritscher.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/18] Disable the proxy fsdev under Windows. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Fritscher Cc: sw@weilnetz.de, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:17:29 +0100 "Michael Fritscher" wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:13:08 +0200 > > Michael Fritscher wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Fritscher > > > > What's the justification for this patch ? > It had too much linuxisms in it to fix compiling - so I disabled the proxy > variant altogether. Reactivating it could be done in a version 2.0 ;-) > That's what I was guessing. Fair enough but it deserves some justification in the commit log anyway :) BTW, the main justification for the proxy backend is to provide "extra" security (the helper chroots into the shared directory). I don't know if this makes sense on a windows host. Also, if you go for a windows specific backend as suggested in another mail, you should probably disable all the other existing backends as well. > Best regards, > Michael Fritscher > >