qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] raw: Reflect read-only protocol layer
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:30:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107163010.GD4706@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f8868da-db64-b203-130d-d3fce3bd5ba2@redhat.com>

Am 07.11.2017 um 12:00 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 07/11/2017 04:02, Eric Blake wrote:
> > We forbid operations like a zero-length write zero or a discard
> > at the protocol layer when it is marked read-only, but those
> > same operations were succeeding at the format layer because the
> > raw format was not reflecting the underlying read-only status
> > to the block layer, which then took short circuit paths on
> > zero-length operations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/raw-format.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/raw-format.c b/block/raw-format.c
> > index 830243a8e4..717b8eff65 100644
> > --- a/block/raw-format.c
> > +++ b/block/raw-format.c
> > @@ -418,6 +418,12 @@ static int raw_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict *options, int flags,
> >          bs->file->bs->supported_write_flags;
> >      bs->supported_zero_flags = (BDRV_REQ_FUA | BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP) &
> >          bs->file->bs->supported_zero_flags;
> > +    if (bdrv_is_read_only(bs->file->bs)) {
> > +        ret = bdrv_set_read_only(bs, true, errp);
> > +        if (ret < 0) {
> > +            return ret;
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > 
> >      if (bs->probed && !bdrv_is_read_only(bs)) {
> >          fprintf(stderr,
> > 
> 
> Kevin, perhaps this should be done straight in block.c?

No, I just discussed this with Eric on IRC, and it shouldn't be done
anywhere.

Basically, the way qemu works with read-only images is that you need to
be explicit about it and specify read-only=on. Drivers are not supposed
to magically set the read-only flag if the user didn't request it.

So what NBD needs to do is to error out if you try to open a read-write
connection to a read-only NBD server.


There's a second part, related specifically to this patch, that was a
bit surprising to me at first, but it actually makes sense. I can
successfully create a read-write raw node on top of a read-only
file-posix node:

    -blockdev driver=file,filename=/tmp/test.qcow2,node-name=proto,read-only=on
    -blockdev driver=raw,file=proto,node-name=format

This is because in this state without a user, the raw node doesn't
actually want to write to the file-posix node. However, if I add a disk:

    -device ide-hd,drive=format

That will actually request write permissions throughout the whole chain
and cause an error:

    qemu-system-x86_64: -device ide-hd,drive=format: Block node is read-only

Somewhat surprising at first, but it does make sense.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-07 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-07  3:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] various NBD fixes for 2.11 Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] nbd-client: Fix error message typos Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] nbd/client: Nicer trace of structured reply Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] raw: Reflect read-only protocol layer Eric Blake
2017-11-07 11:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-07 16:30     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] nbd-client: Honor server read-only advertisement Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] nbd: Fix struct name for structured reads Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] nbd-client: Short-circuit 0-length operations Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] nbd-client: Stricter enforcing of structured reply spec Eric Blake
2017-11-07  3:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] nbd/server: Fix structured read of length 0 Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171107163010.GD4706@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).