From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCfTu-0001gW-01 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:34:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCfTt-0001Ik-An for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:34:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:34:18 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20171109053257.GB13786@lemon> References: <151017987286.354.17484911984782218867@bafd83ae6430> <7741570f-5544-be75-840e-99aa44f19e9f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7741570f-5544-be75-840e-99aa44f19e9f@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] various NBD fixes for 2.11 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org On Wed, 11/08 17:05, Eric Blake wrote: > But I'm not sure if there is an easy way to tell patchew to include a > fixup patch and re-test the series, short of sending a v3. Yeah, I don't know a way either. Fam