From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] s390x/pci: search for subregion inside the BARs
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:03:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171113170300.5b42c9ad.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510075479-17224-8-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:24:39 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> When dispatching memory access to PCI BAR region, we must
> look for eventual subregion, used by the PCI device to map
s/eventual subregion/possible subregions/ ?
> different memory areas inside the same PCI BAR.
>
> Since the data offset we received is calculated starting at the
> region start address we need to adjust the offset for the subregion.
>
> The data offset inside the subregion is calculated by substracting
> the subregion's starting address from the data offset in the region.
>
> The function trap_msix() was used, despite not really useful since we
> removed the index from the msix message. With this patch we can
> definitively suppress this function.
Suggest rewording this (see below).
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> index 97f62b5..b59ceef 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> @@ -344,12 +344,31 @@ static int zpci_endian_swap(uint64_t *ptr, uint8_t len)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static MemoryRegion *s390_get_subregion(MemoryRegion *mr, uint64_t offset,
> + uint8_t len)
> +{
> + MemoryRegion *other;
> + uint64_t subregion_size;
> +
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(other, &mr->subregions, subregions_link) {
> + subregion_size = int128_get64(other->size);
> + if ((offset >= other->addr) &&
> + (offset + len) <= (other->addr + subregion_size)) {
> + mr = other;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + return mr;
> +}
> +
So, this works for the msix stuff because it is a subregion?
This means you can remove trap_msix() because it is handled in a
generic way now, doesn't it?
> static MemTxResult zpci_read_bar(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, uint8_t pcias,
> uint64_t offset, uint64_t *data, uint8_t len)
> {
> MemoryRegion *mr;
>
> mr = pbdev->pdev->io_regions[pcias].memory;
> + mr = s390_get_subregion(mr, offset, len);
> + offset -= mr->addr;
> return memory_region_dispatch_read(mr, offset, data, len,
> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> }
> @@ -443,30 +462,14 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int trap_msix(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, uint64_t offset, uint8_t pcias)
> -{
> - if (pbdev->msix.available && pbdev->msix.table_bar == pcias &&
> - offset >= pbdev->msix.table_offset &&
> - offset < (pbdev->msix.table_offset +
> - pbdev->msix.entries * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE)) {
> - return 1;
> - } else {
> - return 0;
> - }
> -}
> -
> static MemTxResult zpci_write_bar(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, uint8_t pcias,
> uint64_t offset, uint64_t data, uint8_t len)
> {
> MemoryRegion *mr;
>
> - if (trap_msix(pbdev, offset, pcias)) {
> - offset = offset - pbdev->msix.table_offset;
> - mr = &pbdev->pdev->msix_table_mmio;
> - } else {
> - mr = pbdev->pdev->io_regions[pcias].memory;
> - }
> -
> + mr = pbdev->pdev->io_regions[pcias].memory;
> + mr = s390_get_subregion(mr, offset, len);
> + offset -= mr->addr;
> return memory_region_dispatch_write(mr, offset, data, len,
> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> }
> @@ -728,6 +731,9 @@ int pcistb_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r3, uint64_t gaddr,
> }
>
> mr = pbdev->pdev->io_regions[pcias].memory;
> + mr = s390_get_subregion(mr, offset, len);
> + offset -= mr->addr;
> +
> if (!memory_region_access_valid(mr, offset, len, true)) {
> program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, 6);
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-13 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-07 17:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] s390x/pci: Improve zPCI to cover more cases Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] s390x/pci: factor out endianess conversion Pierre Morel
2017-11-09 16:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-09 18:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-11-09 19:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 15:36 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 16:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 16:43 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 9:34 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 9:37 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI STORE Pierre Morel
2017-11-09 16:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-10 9:22 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-11-13 9:03 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 11:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 14:40 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI LOAD Pierre Morel
2017-11-09 16:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 9:07 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 9:44 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI STORE BLOCK Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 15:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 16:38 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 17:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-15 10:05 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] s390x/pci: move the memory region read from pcilg Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] s390x/pci: move the memory region write from pcistg Pierre Morel
2017-11-09 19:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-10 9:40 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-11-10 9:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 9:17 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 11:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 14:44 ` Pierre Morel
2017-11-07 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] s390x/pci: search for subregion inside the BARs Pierre Morel
2017-11-13 16:03 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-11-07 17:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] s390x/pci: Improve zPCI to cover more cases Cornelia Huck
2017-11-07 17:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-08 8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-13 17:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-11-15 10:02 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171113170300.5b42c9ad.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).