From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eF1Cz-0007SB-DX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:10:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eF1Cy-0001GY-In for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:10:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:10:34 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20171115181034.5f0b624e.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171115154223.109991-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> References: <20171115154223.109991-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390/kvm_virtio/linux-headers: remove traces of old virtio transport List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel , qemu-s390x , Halil Pasic , Alexander Graf , Richard Henderson On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:42:23 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We no longer support the old s390 transport, neither does the newest > Linux kernel. Remove it from the linux header script as well as the > s390x virtio code. We still should handle the VIRTIO_NOTIFY hypercall, > to tolerate early printk on older guest kernels without an sclp console. Are there any such guests still around? Wouldn't they be unable to run because of the missing old transport anyway? > We continue to ignore these events. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > --- > hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h | 6 ++- > include/standard-headers/asm-s390/kvm_virtio.h | 64 -------------------------- > scripts/update-linux-headers.sh | 1 - > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 include/standard-headers/asm-s390/kvm_virtio.h