qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
	eblake@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/snapshot: dirty all dirty bitmaps on snapshot-switch
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:42:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171117134247.GE4795@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75e64a04-dfd4-2e66-dad6-95c8f012ad6f@openvz.org>

Am 17.11.2017 um 13:58 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> On 11/17/2017 03:30 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 23.10.2017 um 11:29 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> >> Snapshot-switch actually changes active state of disk so it should
> >> reflect on dirty bitmaps. Otherwise next incremental backup using
> >> these bitmaps will be invalid.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> > We discussed this quite a while ago, and I'm still not convinced that
> > this approach makes sense.
> >
> > Can you give just one example of a use case where dirtying the whole
> > bitmap while loading a snapshot is the desired behaviour?
> >
> > I think the most useful behaviour would be something where the bitmaps
> > themselves are snapshotted, too. But for the time being, the easiest and
> > safest solution might just be to error out in any snapshot operations
> > if any bitmaps are in use.
> >
> The problem is that snapshotting of bitmaps will just provide wrong
> result.

Only if the user does the wrong thing. :-)

> Let us assume that we have bitmap named A.
> 
> The user has started it and made full backup B.
> The user made snapshot S. At this moment bitmap A is saved as A' to bitmap.
> The user has made incremental backup B1. A is reset to 0.
> The user has made incremental backup B2. A is reset to 0 again.
> 
> At this moment the user has reverted to snapshot S.
> What we need to make incremental backup at the moment?

The important point here is that the backup that you should make is not
incremental compared to B2, but to B (i.e. the last backup at the point
when the snapshot was made).

If your snapshot chain branches, your backups have to branch, too.

> The difference in between states B2 and S. This is __for sure__
> not A'. Thus saving of the bitmap at the moment is quite
> useless and we need to reset bitmap to full.

A' still contains the differences between B and the point when S was
created. So if you take a new incremental backup B'1 based on B, the
correct bitmap to use would be A'.

But I agree that this is complicated and probably easy to misuse, so
just erroring out is a serious option. And if we do this, at least we
don't set a bad solution in stone and can always add a better solution
if we can later think of one.

I just don't think that marking everything dirty is a good solution. It
forces the user to make a full backup, so we could just as well ask the
user to delete the bitmap before they load a snapshot.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-23  9:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/snapshot: dirty all dirty bitmaps on snapshot-switch Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-10-27 21:23 ` Eric Blake
2017-11-02 20:55 ` John Snow
2017-11-14 14:58 ` Max Reitz
2017-11-17 12:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-11-17 12:58   ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-11-17 13:42     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2017-11-17 13:45       ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-11-17 15:01   ` Max Reitz
2017-11-17 18:15     ` John Snow
2017-11-17 18:25       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-11-17 20:40         ` John Snow
2017-11-20  9:51           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2017-11-20 12:00             ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171117134247.GE4795@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).