From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eGpCW-0001Sf-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:45:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eGpCT-0001bp-7E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:45:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eGpCT-0001be-0I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:45:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:45:32 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20171120164532.GF7197@localhost.localdomain> References: <20171012235439.19457-1-anatol.pomozov@gmail.com> <20171012235439.19457-4-anatol.pomozov@gmail.com> <20171019093647.GA6195@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] multiboot: load elf sections and section headers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anatol Pomozov Cc: QEMU Developers , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost , Paolo Bonzini , Alexander Graf , peter.maydell@linaro.org Am 17.11.2017 um 22:33 hat Anatol Pomozov geschrieben: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Anatol Pomozov > wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > >> Am 18.10.2017 um 19:22 hat Anatol Pomozov geschrieben: > >>> Hello qemu-devs, > >>> > >>> This patchset has been posted a while ago. I would like to move > >>> forward with it and look at the next task (e.g. multiboot2 support in > >>> QEMU). Who is the multiboot code maintainer who can help to review > >>> this patchset and give go/no-go answer? > >> > >> I think that's exactly your problem, there is nobody who feels > >> responsible for Multiboot support. Officially, it is part of the PC/x86 > >> subsystems: > > > > In this case I would like to become the official Qemu/Multiboot > > maintainer. I do development related to x86 osdev and actively use > > qemu for my projects. I am interested in having a feature-rich and > > robust Multiboot implementation. > > It is very unfortunate to see lack of interest in improving > qemu/multiboot functionality. I guess my best option for now is to > avoid using qemu multiboot implementation and use grub instead. Let's wait until 2.11 is out and we're out of freeze, and then I think your best bet is to just prepare a pull request that adds you to MAINTAINERS and applies the patches you created so far. Peter, does this sound right? Kevin