From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] migration/ram.c: do not set 'postcopy_running' in POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:54:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171121185457.GA2913@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vai3pj9e.fsf@secure.mitica>
* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > When migrating a VM with 'migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on'
> > a postcopy_state is set during the process, ending up with the
> > state POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END when the migration is over. This
> > postcopy_state is taken into account inside ram_load to check
> > how it will load the memory pages. This same ram_load is called when
> > in a loadvm command.
> >
> > Inside ram_load, the logic to see if we're at postcopy_running state
> > is:
> >
> > postcopy_running = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING
> >
> > postcopy_state_get() returns this enum type:
> >
> > typedef enum {
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_NONE = 0,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_DISCARD,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_RUNNING,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END
> > } PostcopyState;
> >
> > In the case where ram_load is executed and postcopy_state is
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END, postcopy_running will be set to 'true' and
> > ram_load will behave like a postcopy is in progress. This scenario isn't
> > achievable in a migration but it is reproducible when executing
> > savevm/loadvm after migrating with 'postcopy-ram on', causing loadvm
> > to fail with Error -22:
> >
> > Source:
> >
> > (qemu) migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
> > (qemu) migrate tcp:127.0.0.1:4444
> >
> > Dest:
> >
> > (qemu) migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
> > (qemu)
> > ubuntu1704-intel login:
> > Ubuntu 17.04 ubuntu1704-intel ttyS0
> >
> > ubuntu1704-intel login: (qemu)
> > (qemu) savevm test1
> > (qemu) loadvm test1
> > Unknown combination of migration flags: 0x4 (postcopy mode)
> > error while loading state for instance 0x0 of device 'ram'
> > Error -22 while loading VM state
> > (qemu)
> >
> > This patch fixes this problem by changing a bit the semantics
> > of postcopy_running inside ram_load, verifying first if
> > we're not in the POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END state. In this case,
> > postcopy_running is set to 'false'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>
> queued
Wrong version; v3 is:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-11/msg03188.html
Dave
> > ---
> > migration/ram.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > index 8620aa400a..43ed719668 100644
> > --- a/migration/ram.c
> > +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > @@ -2803,13 +2803,21 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
> > int flags = 0, ret = 0, invalid_flags = 0;
> > static uint64_t seq_iter;
> > int len = 0;
> > - /*
> > - * If system is running in postcopy mode, page inserts to host memory must
> > - * be atomic
> > - */
> > - bool postcopy_running = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING;
> > - /* ADVISE is earlier, it shows the source has the postcopy capability on */
> > - bool postcopy_advised = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE;
> > + bool postcopy_advised = false, postcopy_running = false;
> > + uint8_t postcopy_state = postcopy_state_get();
> > +
> > + if (postcopy_state != POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END) {
> > + /*
> > + * If system is running in postcopy mode, page inserts to host memory
> > + * must be atomic
> > + */
> > + postcopy_running = postcopy_state >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING;
> > +
> > + /* ADVISE is earlier, it shows the source has the postcopy
> > + * capability on
> > + */
> > + postcopy_advised = postcopy_state >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE;
> > + }
> >
> > seq_iter++;
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-10 20:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] migration/ram.c: do not set 'postcopy_running' in POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END Daniel Henrique Barboza
2017-11-13 3:22 ` Peter Xu
2017-11-13 11:39 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2017-11-21 18:41 ` Juan Quintela
2017-11-21 18:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-11-22 8:22 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171121185457.GA2913@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).