From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eI9YI-0008Sg-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 03:41:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eI9YD-0000gQ-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 03:41:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:41:20 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20171124084120.GC3108@lemon> References: <20171123175747.2309-1-famz@redhat.com> <20171124061234.GB14612@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171124061234.GB14612@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] block: Workaround for the iotests errors List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jeff Cody Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz , pbonzini@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi On Fri, 11/24 01:12, Jeff Cody wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:57:46AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > > Jeff's block job patch made the latent drain bug visible, and I find this > > patch, which by itself also makes some sense, can hide it again. :) With it > > applied we are at least back to the ground where patchew's iotests (make > > docker-test-block@fedora) can pass. > > > > Unfortunately, I am still seeing segfaults and aborts even with this patch. > For instance, on tests: 097 141 176. OK, so the graph change during bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end still bits. We'll need more code to secure it. Fam