From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJrAU-0004dl-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:28:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJrAT-0005G6-9w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:28:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:27:52 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20171129012752.GC8889@lemon> References: <20171012135313.227864-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20171114050006.GD5399@localhost.localdomain> <20171128194413.GJ25110@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171128194413.GJ25110@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] backup improvements part 1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jeff Cody Cc: John Snow , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org On Tue, 11/28 14:44, Jeff Cody wrote: > > Yes, I can bring in through my tree, unless Fam prefers to have it - I'll > > pull it in via my block-next branch. > > > > Rather than keep this on my email queue: > > Applied to my block-next branch: > > git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc block-next Yes, thanks, sorry for not noticing you're pending on my response. Fam