From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] vfio: Allow configuration without INTx
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:33:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129083347.1b6c0859@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171122051649.3599-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:16:49 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
> On some platforms INTx may not be enabled on a KVM host (one such
> example is IBM pHyp hypervisor and this is intentional). However
> the PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN is not 0 so QEMU tries initializing INTx, fails as
> (!vdev->pdev->irq) in the VFIO's vfio_intx_enable() and this is
> a fatal error.
>
> This adds a debug switch - "x-no-intx" - in order to allow broken INTx
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
>
> In practice, test teams run PR KVM under HV KVM and there INTx is enabled
> on all levels so having this as a debug switch is enough.
> ---
> hw/vfio/pci.h | 1 +
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 8 +++++++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.h b/hw/vfio/pci.h
> index 502a575..c5e168e 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.h
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.h
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ typedef struct VFIOPCIDevice {
> bool has_flr;
> bool has_pm_reset;
> bool rom_read_failed;
> + bool no_intx;
> bool no_kvm_intx;
> bool no_kvm_msi;
> bool no_kvm_msix;
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index c977ee3..c9caf6a 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -2869,7 +2869,12 @@ static void vfio_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error **errp)
> pci_device_set_intx_routing_notifier(&vdev->pdev, vfio_intx_update);
> ret = vfio_intx_enable(vdev, errp);
> if (ret) {
> - goto out_teardown;
> + if (vdev->no_intx) {
> + error_report_err(*errp);
> + *errp = NULL;
> + } else {
> + goto out_teardown;
> + }
Why do we try to setup INTx and let it fail, potentially with errors to
the log, if the user has specified x-no-intx? Why does the kernel
advertise INTx is available via the pin register if it's not
supported? I'm not opposed to a debug flag to disable INTx, but by
definition, "x-" prefix flags are not supported and it seems like you
have a configuration that needs a supported mechanism of turning this
off. Thanks,
Alex
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2986,6 +2991,7 @@ static Property vfio_pci_dev_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-igd-opregion", VFIOPCIDevice, features,
> VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_IGD_OPREGION_BIT, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-mmap", VFIOPCIDevice, vbasedev.no_mmap, false),
> + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-intx", VFIOPCIDevice, no_intx, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-intx", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_intx, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-msi", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_msi, false),
> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-no-kvm-msix", VFIOPCIDevice, no_kvm_msix, false),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 5:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] vfio: Allow configuration without INTx Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-11-22 5:44 ` no-reply
2017-11-29 15:33 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-11-30 2:08 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2017-11-30 16:51 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171129083347.1b6c0859@t450s.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).