From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] blockjob: reimplement block_job_sleep_ns to allow cancellation
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:52:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129135235.GF18521@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129125439.GB3753@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 01:54:39PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.11.2017 um 11:25 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> > This reverts the effects of commit 4afeffc857 ("blockjob: do not allow
> > coroutine double entry or entry-after-completion", 2017-11-21)
> >
> > This fixed the symptom of a bug rather than the root cause. Canceling the
> > wait on a sleeping blockjob coroutine is generally fine, we just need to
> > make it work correctly across AioContexts. To do so, use a QEMUTimer
> > that calls block_job_enter. Use a mutex to ensure that block_job_enter
> > synchronizes correctly with block_job_sleep_ns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > blockjob.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > include/block/blockjob.h | 5 +++-
> > include/block/blockjob_int.h | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/blockjob.c b/blockjob.c
> > index 4d22b7d2fb..3fdaabbc1f 100644
> > --- a/blockjob.c
> > +++ b/blockjob.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,26 @@
> > #include "qemu/timer.h"
> > #include "qapi-event.h"
> >
> > +/* Right now, this mutex is only needed to synchronize accesses to job->busy,
> > + * especially concurrent calls to block_job_enter.
> > + */
>
> As discussed with Paolo on IRC, I'll replace the second line of this
> comment, which he had in a different place originally and became prone
> to misunderstanding now. The new version is:
>
> /* Right now, this mutex is only needed to synchronize accesses to job->busy,
> * such as concurrent calls to block_job_do_yield and block_job_enter.
> */
>
By synchronizing job->busy, job->sleep_timer is also protected. But
job->sleep_timer needs synchronization too, it just gets it since job->busy
needs it too. Maybe worth saying:
/* Right now, this mutex is only needed to synchronize accesses to
* job->busy and job->sleep_timer, such as concurrent calls to
* block_job_do_yield and block_job_enter.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 10:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] blockjob: reinstate busy=false/busy=true in block_job_sleep_ns Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-29 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block: Expect graph changes in bdrv_parent_drained_begin/end Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-29 12:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Alberto Garcia
2017-11-29 13:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-29 13:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-12-01 10:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-29 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] blockjob: remove clock argument from block_job_sleep_ns Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-29 12:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Alberto Garcia
2017-11-29 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jeff Cody
2017-11-29 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-29 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] blockjob: introduce block_job_do_yield Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-29 13:30 ` Jeff Cody
2017-11-29 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-29 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] blockjob: reimplement block_job_sleep_ns to allow cancellation Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-29 12:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-11-29 13:52 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2017-11-29 13:56 ` Jeff Cody
2017-11-29 14:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-11-29 14:25 ` Jeff Cody
2017-11-29 14:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-29 21:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2017-11-29 13:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] blockjob: reinstate busy=false/busy=true in block_job_sleep_ns Jeff Cody
2017-11-29 13:14 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171129135235.GF18521@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).