From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKDBj-0002CW-RZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:58:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKDBg-00038Z-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:58:51 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:44933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKDBg-0002ON-Gm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:58:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:58:17 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox Message-ID: <20171130005817.GA14785@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1511963726-34070-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1511963726-34070-2-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1511963726-34070-2-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v18 01/10] idr: add #include List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wei Wang Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mawilcox@microsoft.com, david@redhat.com, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, quan.xu@aliyun.com, nilal@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, Masahiro Yamada On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:55:17PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > The was removed from radix-tree.h by the following commit: > f5bba9d11a256ad2a1c2f8e7fc6aabe6416b7890. > > Since that commit, tools/testing/radix-tree/ couldn't pass compilation > due to: tools/testing/radix-tree/idr.c:17: undefined reference to > WARN_ON_ONCE. This patch adds the bug.h header to idr.h to solve the > issue. Thanks; I sent this same patch out yesterday. Unfortunately, you didn't cc the author of this breakage, Masahiro Yamada. I want to highlight that these kinds of header cleanups are risky, and very low reward. I really don't want to see patches going all over the tree randomly touching header files. If we've got a real problem to solve, then sure. But I want to see a strong justification for any more header file cleanups.