From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 9/9] s390x: change the QEMU cpu model to a stripped down z12
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:24:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205162408.31ccdf1f.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204140150.20483-10-david@redhat.com>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:01:50 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> We are good enough to boot upstream Linux kernels / Fedora 26/27. That
> should be suficient for now.
s/suficient/sufficient/
>
> As the QEMU CPU model is migration safe, let's add compatibility code.
> Generate the feature list to reduce the trouble of messing things up in the
> future.
So we can mess up things effortlessly? :)
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 6 +++
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 3 ++
> target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> target/s390x/cpu_models.h | 1 +
> target/s390x/gen-features.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index a23b8aec9f..edd18b7fac 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -721,6 +721,9 @@ bool css_migration_enabled(void)
>
> static void ccw_machine_2_12_instance_options(MachineState *machine)
> {
> + const S390FeatBitmap qemu_cpu_feat = { S390_FEAT_LIST_QEMU_V2_12 };
> +
> + s390_set_qemu_cpu_model(0x2827, 12, 2, qemu_cpu_feat);
Does this want a comment?
> }
>
> static void ccw_machine_2_12_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> @@ -730,7 +733,10 @@ DEFINE_CCW_MACHINE(2_12, "2.12", true);
>
> static void ccw_machine_2_11_instance_options(MachineState *machine)
> {
> + const S390FeatBitmap qemu_cpu_feat = { S390_FEAT_LIST_QEMU_V2_11 };
> ccw_machine_2_12_instance_options(machine);
> +
> + s390_set_qemu_cpu_model(0x2064, 7, 1, qemu_cpu_feat);
Dito.
> }
>
> static void ccw_machine_2_11_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> @@ -81,6 +80,11 @@ static S390CPUDef s390_cpu_defs[] = {
> CPUDEF_INIT(0x3906, 14, 1, 47, 0x08000000U, "z14", "IBM z14 GA1"),
> };
> +static S390CPUDef s390_qemu_cpu_def;
> +static S390CPUModel s390_qemu_cpu_model;
> +
> +/* Set the qemu CPU model (on machine initialization). Must not be called
> + * once CPUs have been created.
> + */
> +void s390_set_qemu_cpu_model(uint16_t type, uint8_t gen, uint8_t ec_ga,
> + const S390FeatBitmap features)
> +{
> + const S390CPUDef *def = s390_find_cpu_def(type, gen, ec_ga, NULL);
> +
> + g_assert(def);
> + g_assert(QTAILQ_EMPTY(&cpus));
> +
> + /* TCG emulates some features that can usually not be enabled with
> + * the emulated machine generation. Make sure they can be enabled
> + * when using the QEMU model by adding them to full_feat. We have
> + * to copy the definition to do that.
> + */
> + memcpy(&s390_qemu_cpu_def, def, sizeof(s390_qemu_cpu_def));
> + bitmap_or(s390_qemu_cpu_def.full_feat, s390_qemu_cpu_def.full_feat,
> + qemu_max_cpu_feat, S390_FEAT_MAX);
> +
So is this the place to e.g. enable zpci? Or does this need to go into
the feature definitions?
> + /* build the CPU model */
> + s390_qemu_cpu_model.def = &s390_qemu_cpu_def;
> + bitmap_copy(s390_qemu_cpu_model.features, features, S390_FEAT_MAX);
> +}
> +
> static void s390_qemu_cpu_model_initfn(Object *obj)
> {
> - static S390CPUDef s390_qemu_cpu_defs;
> S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(obj);
>
> cpu->model = g_malloc0(sizeof(*cpu->model));
> - /* TCG emulates a z900 (with some optional additional features) */
> - memcpy(&s390_qemu_cpu_defs, &s390_cpu_defs[0], sizeof(s390_qemu_cpu_defs));
> - add_qemu_cpu_model_features(s390_qemu_cpu_defs.full_feat);
> - cpu->model->def = &s390_qemu_cpu_defs;
> - bitmap_copy(cpu->model->features, cpu->model->def->default_feat,
> - S390_FEAT_MAX);
> + /* has to be initialized by now via s390_set_qemu_cpu_model() */
> + g_assert(s390_qemu_cpu_model.def);
> + /* copy the CPU model so we can modify it */
> + memcpy(cpu->model, &s390_qemu_cpu_model, sizeof(*cpu->model));
> }
>
> static void s390_cpu_model_finalize(Object *obj)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.h b/target/s390x/cpu_models.h
> index 4c6dee1871..11cf5386fb 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #define TARGET_S390X_CPU_MODELS_H
>
> #include "cpu_features.h"
> +#include "gen-features.h"
> #include "qom/cpu.h"
>
> /* static CPU definition */
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 68e6c31b4b..983f2dcd52 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -536,6 +536,51 @@ static uint16_t default_GEN14_GA1[] = {
> S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_8,
> };
>
> +/* QEMU (CPU model) features */
> +
> +static uint16_t qemu_V2_11[] = {
> + S390_FEAT_GROUP_PLO,
> + S390_FEAT_ESAN3,
> + S390_FEAT_ZARCH,
> +};
> +
> +static uint16_t qemu_V2_12[] = {
> + S390_FEAT_DAT_ENH,
> + S390_FEAT_IDTE_SEGMENT,
> + S390_FEAT_STFLE,
> + S390_FEAT_SENSE_RUNNING_STATUS,
> + S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_TRANSLATION_2,
> + S390_FEAT_MSA,
> + S390_FEAT_LONG_DISPLACEMENT,
> + S390_FEAT_LONG_DISPLACEMENT_FAST,
> + S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_IMMEDIATE,
> + S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_TRANSLATION_3,
> + S390_FEAT_ETF2_ENH,
> + S390_FEAT_STORE_CLOCK_FAST,
> + S390_FEAT_MOVE_WITH_OPTIONAL_SPEC,
> + S390_FEAT_ETF3_ENH,
> + S390_FEAT_EXTRACT_CPU_TIME,
> + S390_FEAT_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_AND_STORE,
> + S390_FEAT_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_AND_STORE_2,
> + S390_FEAT_GENERAL_INSTRUCTIONS_EXT,
> + S390_FEAT_EXECUTE_EXT,
> + S390_FEAT_SET_PROGRAM_PARAMETERS,
> + S390_FEAT_FLOATING_POINT_SUPPPORT_ENH,
> + S390_FEAT_STFLE_45,
> + S390_FEAT_STFLE_49,
> + S390_FEAT_LOCAL_TLB_CLEARING,
> + S390_FEAT_INTERLOCKED_ACCESS_2,
> + S390_FEAT_STFLE_53,
> + S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_4,
> + S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_3,
> +};
> +
> +/* add all new definitions before this point */
> +static uint16_t qemu_MAX[] = {
> + /* generates a dependency warning, leave it out for now */
> + S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_5,
> +};
> +
> /****** END FEATURE DEFS ******/
>
> #define _YEARS "2016"
> @@ -627,6 +672,24 @@ static FeatGroupDefSpec FeatGroupDef[] = {
> FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA_EXT_8),
> };
>
> +#define QEMU_FEAT_INITIALIZER(_name) \
> + { \
> + .name = "S390_FEAT_LIST_QEMU_" #_name, \
> + .bits = \
> + { .data = qemu_##_name, \
> + .len = ARRAY_SIZE(qemu_##_name) }, \
> + }
> +
> +/*******************************
> + * QEMU (CPU model) features
> + *******************************/
> +static FeatGroupDefSpec QemuFeatDef[] = {
> + QEMU_FEAT_INITIALIZER(V2_11),
> + QEMU_FEAT_INITIALIZER(V2_12),
> + QEMU_FEAT_INITIALIZER(MAX),
> +};
> +
> +
> static void set_bits(uint64_t list[], BitSpec bits)
> {
> uint32_t i;
> @@ -684,6 +747,29 @@ static void print_feature_defs(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static void print_qemu_feature_defs(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t feat[S390_FEAT_MAX / 64 + 1] = {};
> + int i, j;
> +
> + printf("\n/* QEMU (CPU model) feature list data */\n");
> +
> + /* for now we assume that we only add new features */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(QemuFeatDef); i++) {
> + set_bits(feat, QemuFeatDef[i].bits);
> +
> + printf("#define %s\t", QemuFeatDef[i].name);
> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(feat); j++) {
> + printf("0x%016"PRIx64"ULL", feat[j]);
> + if (j < ARRAY_SIZE(feat) - 1) {
> + printf(",");
> + } else {
> + printf("\n");
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void print_feature_group_defs(void)
> {
> int i, j;
> @@ -721,6 +807,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> "#ifndef %s\n#define %s\n", __FILE__, _YEARS, _NAME_H, _NAME_H);
> print_feature_defs();
> print_feature_group_defs();
> + print_qemu_feature_defs();
> printf("\n#endif\n");
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 14:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 0/9] s390x/tcg: facilitites and instructions David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 1/9] s390x/tcg: ALSI/ALSGI are atomic with interlocked-acccess facility 1 David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 2/9] s390x/tcg: implement Interlocked-Access Facility 2 David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 3/9] s390x/tcg: wire up SET ADDRESS LIMIT David Hildenbrand
2017-12-05 14:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-05 16:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 4/9] s390x/tcg: wire up SET CHANNEL MONITOR David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 17:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-04 17:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 17:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-04 17:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 5/9] s390x/tcg: Implement STORE CHANNEL PATH STATUS David Hildenbrand
2017-12-05 15:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 6/9] s390x/tcg: Implement SIGA instruction David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 17:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 7/9] s390x/tcg: implement extract-CPU-time facility David Hildenbrand
2017-12-05 15:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-05 16:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 8/9] s390x/tcg: we already implement the Set-Program-Parameter facility David Hildenbrand
2017-12-05 15:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-04 14:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 9/9] s390x: change the QEMU cpu model to a stripped down z12 David Hildenbrand
2017-12-05 15:24 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-12-05 16:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-04 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.12 01/10] s390x/tcg: ASI/ASGI are atomic with interlocked-acccess facility 1 David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205162408.31ccdf1f.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).