From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eN16q-0000bt-65 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:41:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eN16p-0003qE-Gn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:41:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eN16p-0003p6-AF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:41:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:41:18 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20171207184104.GA2489@work-vm> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] iSER transport name is not good List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Charles Kelimod Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, pl@kamp.de * Charles Kelimod (lichstor@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm on the road of modifying libvirt to add iSER support, and I found qemu > is actually support that. But, the transport name is iSER, which should be > RDMA and there libvirt already defined it. > > Best Regards, > Charles. Hi Charles, So this is iSCSI extensions for RDMA? I've cc'd in the qemu iSCSI maintainers. Can you just explain what you're seeing libvirt do and what you think qemu is expecting it to do for iSER? Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK