From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOMVf-0005SD-5P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:44:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOMVe-0003KJ-Ga for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:44:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:44:25 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20171211114425.GD3350@lemon> References: <20171211093314.16974-1-famz@redhat.com> <20171211095044.GA7707@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171211095044.GA7707@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] qemu-img: Document --force-share / -U List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, kchamart@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , stefanha@redhat.com On Mon, 12/11 10:50, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 11.12.2017 um 10:33 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben: > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > > > > --- > > > > v3: Document that the option is not allowed for read-write. [Stefan] > > > > v2: - "code{qemu-img}". [Kashyap, Eric] > > - "etc.." -> "etc.". > > --- > > qemu-img.texi | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/qemu-img.texi b/qemu-img.texi > > index fdcf120f36..d85ace73f0 100644 > > --- a/qemu-img.texi > > +++ b/qemu-img.texi > > @@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ exclusive with the @var{-O} parameters. It is currently required to also use > > the @var{-n} parameter to skip image creation. This restriction may be relaxed > > in a future release. > > > > +@item --force-share (-U) > > + > > +If specified, @code{qemu-img} will open the image with shared permissions, > > +which makes it less likely to conflict with a running guest's permissions due > > +to image locking. For example, this can be used to get the image information > > +(with 'info' subcommand) when the image is used by a running guest. Note that > > +this could produce inconsistent result because of concurrent metadata changes, > > +etc. This option is only allowed when opening image in read-only mode. > > I think "an image", "the image" or "images" could all work in this > context, but just "image" without an article doesn't. "Images" would be my intent if I proofread it, but you're right, all sound okay to me. Thanks. Fam