From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38189) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOgfO-00038N-CY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:15:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOgfJ-0004za-Dm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:15:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:15:45 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20171212101545.3bbd19dc.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <08154f0d-d526-d735-a952-853fcabe946b@redhat.com> References: <20171211134740.8235-1-david@redhat.com> <20171211134740.8235-5-david@redhat.com> <20171211181754.4a3b847d.cohuck@redhat.com> <08154f0d-d526-d735-a952-853fcabe946b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2-12 04/15] s390x/flic: simplify flic initialization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , Richard Henderson , Alexander Graf , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Thomas Huth On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:34:20 +0100 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 11.12.2017 18:17, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:47:29 +0100 > > David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > >> This makes it clearer, which device is used for which accelerator. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > >> --- > >> hw/intc/s390_flic.c | 9 +++++++-- > >> hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c | 12 ------------ > >> include/hw/s390x/s390_flic.h | 9 --------- > >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/intc/s390_flic.c b/hw/intc/s390_flic.c > >> index 6eaf178d79..a78bdf1d90 100644 > >> --- a/hw/intc/s390_flic.c > >> +++ b/hw/intc/s390_flic.c > >> @@ -40,11 +40,16 @@ void s390_flic_init(void) > >> { > >> DeviceState *dev; > >> > >> - dev = s390_flic_kvm_create(); > >> - if (!dev) { > >> + if (kvm_enabled()) { > >> + dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_KVM_S390_FLIC); > >> + object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_KVM_S390_FLIC, > >> + OBJECT(dev), NULL); > >> + } else if (tcg_enabled()) { > >> dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_QEMU_S390_FLIC); > >> object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_QEMU_S390_FLIC, > >> OBJECT(dev), NULL); > > > > Can you use TYPE_S390_FLIC_COMMON for attaching the flic to the machine? > > I suggest doing that in a separate patch. (I remember that changing the > name should not harm migration). I don't think it harms migration, as we hook up the same device as before (just via the common flic device). Probably does not make sense as a separate patch, though, as you touch this code anyway. > > > > >> + } else { > >> + g_assert_not_reached(); > > > > Checking for tcg_enabled() explicitly does not seem the common pattern, > > although it is fine with me (I doubt we'll support other accelerators > > for s390x in the foreseeable future). > > Indeed, I can drop that. Yup.