From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/19] block: Make bdrv_drain() driver callbacks non-recursive
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:16:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220131618.GD10812@lemon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220103412.13048-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
On Wed, 12/20 11:33, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> bdrv_drain_begin() doesn't increase bs->quiesce_counter recursively,
Pretty trivial but:
s/bdrv_drain_begin/bdrv_drained_begin/
> which means that the child nodes are not actually drained. To keep this
> consistent, we also shouldn't call the block driver callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/io.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index b94740b8ff..91a52e2d82 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_drain_invoke_entry(void *opaque)
> }
>
> /* Recursively call BlockDriver.bdrv_co_drain_begin/end callbacks */
> -static void bdrv_drain_invoke(BlockDriverState *bs, bool begin)
> +static void bdrv_drain_invoke(BlockDriverState *bs, bool begin, bool recursive)
> {
> BdrvChild *child, *tmp;
> BdrvCoDrainData data = { .bs = bs, .done = false, .begin = begin};
> @@ -172,8 +172,10 @@ static void bdrv_drain_invoke(BlockDriverState *bs, bool begin)
> bdrv_coroutine_enter(bs, data.co);
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, !data.done);
>
> - QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(child, &bs->children, next, tmp) {
> - bdrv_drain_invoke(child->bs, begin);
> + if (recursive) {
> + QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(child, &bs->children, next, tmp) {
> + bdrv_drain_invoke(child->bs, begin, true);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -265,7 +267,7 @@ void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs)
> bdrv_parent_drained_begin(bs);
> }
>
> - bdrv_drain_invoke(bs, true);
> + bdrv_drain_invoke(bs, true, false);
I'm not sure I understand this patch. If we call bdrv_drained_begin on a quorum
BDS that has a QED child, we do want to call bdrv_qed_co_drain_begin() on the
child, don't we? I think after this patch, we don't do that any more?
The same question arises when I look at throttle_co_drain_begin()..
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 10:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/19] Drain fixes and cleanups, part 2 Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/19] block: Remove unused bdrv_requests_pending Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/19] block: Assert drain_all is only called from main AioContext Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 12:14 ` Fam Zheng
2017-12-20 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/19] block: Make bdrv_drain() driver callbacks non-recursive Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 13:16 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-12-20 13:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 13:31 ` Fam Zheng
2017-12-20 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/19] test-bdrv-drain: Test callback for bdrv_drain Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/19] test-bdrv-drain: Test bs->quiesce_counter Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/19] blockjob: Pause job on draining any job BDS Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/19] test-bdrv-drain: Test drain vs. block jobs Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/19] block: Don't block_job_pause_all() in bdrv_drain_all() Kevin Wolf
2017-12-21 23:24 ` Eric Blake
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/19] block: Nested drain_end must still call callbacks Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/19] test-bdrv-drain: Test nested drain sections Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/19] block: Don't notify parents in drain call chain Kevin Wolf
2017-12-21 23:26 ` Eric Blake
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/19] block: Add bdrv_subtree_drained_begin/end() Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/19] test-bdrv-drain: Tests for bdrv_subtree_drain Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/19] test-bdrv-drain: Test behaviour in coroutine context Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/19] test-bdrv-drain: Recursive draining with multiple parents Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 16/19] block: Allow graph changes in subtree drained section Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-20 11:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 11:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-20 13:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/19] test-bdrv-drain: Test graph changes in " Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/19] commit: Simplify reopen of base Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 13:32 ` Fam Zheng
2017-12-20 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 19/19] block: Keep nodes drained between reopen_queue/multiple Kevin Wolf
2017-12-20 13:34 ` Fam Zheng
2017-12-20 10:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/19] Drain fixes and cleanups, part 2 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171220131618.GD10812@lemon \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).