From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] migration: move vm_old_running into global state
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:40:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180103104034.GK2557@xz-mi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o9mb1bnf.fsf@secure.laptop>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:05:07AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > Firstly, it was passed around. Let's just move it into MigrationState
> >> > just like many other variables as state of migration.
> >> >
> >> > One thing to mention is that for postcopy, we actually don't need this
> >> > knowledge at all since postcopy can't resume a VM even if it fails (we
> >> > can see that from the old code too: when we try to resume we also check
> >> > against "entered_postcopy" variable). So further we do this:
> >> >
> >> > - in postcopy_start(), we don't update vm_old_running since useless
> >> > - in migration_thread(), we don't need to check entered_postcopy when
> >> > resume, since it's only used for precopy.
> >> >
> >> > Comment this out too for that variable definition.
>
> >> I think this comment is right for precopy, but not for colo. BTW, I
> >> think that I would put the postcopy comment on its use, not here.
> >
> > Or, how about I just don't mention postcopy at all?
>
> Fully agree.
> >>
> >> /me tries to improve the comment
> >>
> >> Guest was running when we enter the completion stage. If migration don't
> >> sucess, we need to continue running guest on source.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > I think it's generally good. Maybe a tiny fix like:
> >
> > s/Guest was/Whether guest was/
>
> ok.
>
> > s/If migration don't sucess/If migration failed/
>
> We also use it in case of migration_cancel. Cancel is not one error,
> that is why I wrote it that way. What about:
>
> Whether guest was running when we enter the completion stage. If
> migration is interrupted by any reason, we need to continue running the
> guest on source.
>
> What do you think?
Sure. I was mostly trying to fix the typo and grammar issue. Will
take your advise.
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-03 5:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] migration: cleanup migration_thread() Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] migration: assert colo instead of check Peter Xu
2018-01-03 8:38 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 8:58 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/11] migration: qemu_savevm_state_cleanup() in cleanup Peter Xu
2018-01-03 9:15 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 9:36 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 10:21 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 10:26 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 11:18 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 11:39 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/11] migration: remove "enable_colo" var Peter Xu
2018-01-03 8:55 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/11] migration: split use of MigrationState.total_time Peter Xu
2018-01-03 8:58 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 9:04 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 9:20 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 9:29 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] migration: move vm_old_running into global state Peter Xu
2018-01-03 9:05 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 9:20 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 10:26 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 10:40 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/11] migration: introduce vm_down_start_time Peter Xu
2018-01-03 9:10 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 9:40 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/11] migration: introduce migrate_calculate_complete Peter Xu
2018-01-03 9:12 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 10:52 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/11] migration: use switch at the end of migration Peter Xu
2018-01-03 9:14 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/11] migration: cleanup stats update into function Peter Xu
2018-01-03 10:08 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 10:55 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 10:58 ` Peter Xu
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/11] migration: major cleanup for migrate iterations Peter Xu
2018-01-03 10:19 ` Juan Quintela
2018-01-03 5:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/11] migration: put the finish part into a new function Peter Xu
2018-01-03 10:20 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180103104034.GK2557@xz-mi \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).