From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-web PATCH] add a blog post about "Spectre"
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:56:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104175609.9085-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
---
_posts/2018-01-04-spectre.md | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 _posts/2018-01-04-spectre.md
diff --git a/_posts/2018-01-04-spectre.md b/_posts/2018-01-04-spectre.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1be86d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_posts/2018-01-04-spectre.md
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "QEMU and the Spectre and Meltdown attacks"
+date: 2018-01-04 18:00:00 +0000
+author: Paolo Bonzini and Eduardo Habkost
+categories: [meltdown, spectre, security, x86]
+---
+As you probably know by now, three critical architectural flaws in CPUs have
+been recently disclosed that allow user processes to read kernel or hypervisor
+memory through cache side-channel attacks. These flaws, collectively
+named _Meltdown_ and _Spectre_, affect in one way or another almost
+all processors that perform out-of-order execution, including x86 (from
+Intel and AMD), POWER, s390 and ARM processors.
+
+No microcode updates are required to block the _Meltdown_ attack; it is
+enough to update the guest operating system to a version that separates
+the user and kernel address spaces (known as _page table isolation_ for
+the Linux kernel). Therefore, this post will focus on _Spectre_, and
+especially on [CVE-2017-5715](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-5715).
+
+Fixing or mitigating _Spectre_ in general, and CVE-2017-5715 in particular,
+requires cooperation between the processor and the operating system kernel or
+hypervisor; the processor can be updated through microcode or millicode
+patches to provide the required functionality. CVE-2017-5715 allows guests
+to read potentially sensitive data from hypervisor memory; however, __patching
+the host kernel is sufficient to block this attack__.
+
+On the other hand, in order to protect the guest kernel from a malicious
+userspace, updates are also needed to the guest kernel and, depending on
+the processor architecture, to QEMU. Just like on bare-metal, the guest
+kernel will use the new functionality provided by the microcode or millicode
+updates. When running under a hypervisor, processor emulation is mostly out of
+QEMU's scope, so QEMU's role in the fix is small, but nevertheless important.
+In the case of KVM:
+
+* QEMU configures the hypervisor to emulate a specific processor model.
+For x86, QEMU has to be aware of new CPUID bits introduced by the microcode
+update, and it must provide them to guests depending on how the guest is
+configured.
+
+* upon virtual machine migration, QEMU reads the CPU state on the source
+and transmits it to the destination. For x86, QEMU has to be aware of new
+model specific registers (MSRs).
+
+Right now, there are no public patches to KVM that expose the new CPUID bits
+and MSRs to the virtual machines, therefore there is no urgent need to update
+QEMU; remember that __updating the host kernel is enough to protect the
+host from malicious guests__. Nevertheless, updates will be posted to the
+qemu-devel mailing list in the next few days, and a 2.11.1 patch release
+will be released with the fix.
+
+As of today, the QEMU project is not aware of whether similar changes will
+be required for non-x86 processors. If so, they will also posted to the
+mailing list and backported to recent stable releases.
+
+For more information on the vulnerabilities, please refer to the [Google Security
+Blog](https://security.googleblog.com/2018/01/todays-cpu-vulnerability-what-you-need.html)
+and [Google Project
+Zero](https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.it/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html)
+posts on the topic, as well as the [Spectre and Meltdown FAQ](https://meltdownattack.com/#faq).
--
2.14.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 17:56 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2018-01-04 17:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-web PATCH] add a blog post about "Spectre" Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 18:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-01-04 18:13 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2018-01-04 18:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 20:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-01-09 2:13 ` Fam Zheng
2018-01-09 8:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180104175609.9085-1-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).