Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6 03/27] qobject: introduce qobject_get_try_str()

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:50:39PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 02:45 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > A quick way to fetch string from qobject when it's a QString.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h |  1 +
> >  qobject/qstring.c          | 11 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h b/include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h
> > index a145c8ca00..6517d8e377 100644
> > --- a/include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h
> > +++ b/include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ QString *qstring_from_substr(const char *str, int start, int end);
> >  size_t qstring_get_length(const QString *qstring);
> >  const char *qstring_get_str(const QString *qstring);
> >  const char *qstring_get_try_str(const QString *qstring);
> > +const char *qobject_get_try_str(const QObject *qstring);
> 
> The naming is consistent, so I won't reject the patch, but 'try_get_str'
> reads better than 'get_try_str'.  Of course, fixing the code base to
> read well AND be consistent is a much bigger task, and I'm not asking
> you to tackle it.

I agree.

> 
> 
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * qobject_get_try_str(): Return a pointer of the backstore string
> 
> The word "backstore" doesn't appear anywhere in qemu.git, and flags as a
> typo.  I'd prefer:
> 
> Return a pointer to the corresponding string

I'll take this one.  Thanks,

> 
> or maybe "backing string"

-- 
Peter Xu