qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: "He, Junyan" <junyan.he@intel.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Some question about savem/qcow2 incremental snapshot
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 20:15:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110201519.GF2451@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QVm+AoRoFNYx-r1k0WTPPopm60dmD7OhGZozm9ARfMwRQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Certain guest operations like rebooting or zeroing memory will defeat
> >> the incremental guest RAM snapshot feature.  It's worth thinking about
> >> these cases to make sure this feature would be worth it in real use
> >> cases.
> >
> > But those probably wouldn't upset an NVDimm?
> 
> If the guest dirties all RAM then the incremental snapshot feature
> degrades to a full snapshot.  I'm asking if there are common
> operations where that happens.
> 
> I seem to remember Windows guests zero all pages on cold boot.  Maybe
> that's not the case anymore.
> 
> Worth checking before embarking on this feature because it could be a
> waste of effort if it turns out real-world guests dirty all memory in
> common cases.

Right, but I'm hoping that there's some magic somewhere where an NVDimm doesn't
get zero'd because of a cold boot since that would seem to make it
volatile.

Dave

--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-10 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-25  7:54 [Qemu-devel] Some question about savem/qcow2 incremental snapshot He, Junyan
2018-01-09 15:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-01-09 19:55   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-01-10 19:16     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-01-10 20:15       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2018-01-10 20:17         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-01-16  7:14           ` He Junyan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-12-25  7:33 He Junyan
2018-05-08 14:41 ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180110201519.GF2451@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=junyan.he@intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).