From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebNu4-0005nk-Ib for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 04:51:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebNu1-0005Ac-Fl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 04:51:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebNu1-0005AD-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 04:51:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1940276532 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:51:23 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20180116095123.GE1521@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" References: <20180115114841.GH8218@redhat.com> <20180115132636.33905fde.cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFE for patchew docker result reporting List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:16:28AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:26 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:48:41 +0000 > > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > > >> Currently if I look at the patchew website for build logs, the 'docker' > >> job results are listed as a single expandable item. > >> > >> Patchew runs 3 separate docker builds, however, and there's a tonne of > >> output to scroll through to find which one actually failed. > >> > >> Thus, my RFE is to split the build log up so that instead of a single > >> "docker" result, it shows "docker quick", "docker biuld" and > >> "docker mingw" as separate build logs / results. This would make it > >> easier to see at a glance which scenario failed. > > > > +1. Splitting the output into smaller units makes sense to me. > > Made the proposed change on patchew.org. Thanks. That's great, thanks for figuring this out so quickly ! Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|