From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] tests: acpi: fix FADT not being compared to reference table
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:17:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116141754.106c8eaf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180116061242-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 06:16:34 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:16:42PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > It turns out that FADT isn't actually tested for changes
> > against reference table, since it happens to be the 1st
> > table in RSDT which is currently ignored.
> > Fix it by making sure that all tables from RSDT are added
> > to test list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>
> This was intentional, wasn't it?
> The reason IIRC was that FADT includes things like the DSDT
> address which can change at any time.
>
> So I think we'll have to tweak the FADT to compare it.
>
> E.g. replace any non-zero pointer with a known pattern,
> and fix up the checksum.
>
> What do you think?
allocated pointers seem to be stable within a BIOS,
but bios update might change that, so you are right.
Perhaps we can just zero out pointers and checksum
in the table when comparing/dumping it
(if isal is fine with it).
So, pls take the rest of the series modulo this
patch which I'll fix/respin to handle pointers.
>
> > ---
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > index 81c558e..c5dccdb 100644
> > --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > @@ -248,14 +248,14 @@ static void test_acpi_dsdt_table(test_data *data)
> > /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */
> > static void fetch_rsdt_referenced_tables(test_data *data)
> > {
> > - int tables_nr = data->rsdt_tables_nr - 1; /* fadt is first */
> > + int tables_nr = data->rsdt_tables_nr;
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < tables_nr; i++) {
> > AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table;
> > uint32_t addr;
> >
> > - addr = le32_to_cpu(data->rsdt_tables_addr[i + 1]); /* fadt is first */
> > + addr = le32_to_cpu(data->rsdt_tables_addr[i]);
> > fetch_table(&ssdt_table, addr);
> >
> > /* Add table to ASL test tables list */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-29 15:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] tests: acpi: fix FADT not being tested and cleanups Igor Mammedov
2017-12-29 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] tests: acpi: move tested tables array allocation outside of test_acpi_dsdt_table() Igor Mammedov
2017-12-29 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] tests: acpi: init table descriptor in test_dst_table() Igor Mammedov
2017-12-29 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] tests: acpi: rename test_acpi_tables()/test_dst_table() to reflect its usage Igor Mammedov
2017-12-29 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] tests: acpi: add comments to fetch_rsdt_referenced_tables/data->tables usage Igor Mammedov
2017-12-29 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] tests: acpi: fix FADT not being compared to reference table Igor Mammedov
2018-01-16 4:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-16 13:17 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180116141754.106c8eaf@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).