From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] s390x: fix storage attributes migration for non-small guests
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:02:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118180240.7d678384.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118175229.42b27779@p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:52:29 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:20:34 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:52:02 +0100
> > Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fix storage attribute migration so that it does not fail for guests
> > > with more than a few GB of RAM. Migration itself was successful, but
> > > storage attributes were not migrated completely.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the migration of all storage attributes, even when
> > > the guest have large amounts of memory.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Fixes: 903fd80b03243476 ("s390x/migration: Storage attributes
> > > device") ---
> > > hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c
> > > b/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c index 41770a7..480551c 100644
> > > --- a/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c
> > > +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c
> > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void
> > > kvm_s390_stattrib_synchronize(S390StAttribState *sa) for (cx = 0;
> > > cx + len <= max; cx += len) { clog.start_gfn = cx;
> > > clog.count = len;
> > > - clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + cx *
> > > len);
> >
> > Hm, doesn't that even imply that you reference an area beyond the
> > buffer, as the <= max check does not catch this?
>
> what do you mean?
>
> cx + len <= max catches the cases where you would write beyond the end
> of the buffer. if cx + len == max then we are filling the buffer to the
> last byte. and we will get out at the next iteration.
Yes, but the problem is that your offset is too long, isn't it? (Where
cx + len <= max, but you use an offset of cx * len which may be > max.)
But maybe I'm simply too tired.
>
> > > + clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + cx);
> > > r = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS,
> > > &clog); if (r) {
> > > error_report("KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS failed: %s",
> > > strerror(-r)); @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void
> > > kvm_s390_stattrib_synchronize(S390StAttribState *sa) if (cx < max) {
> > > clog.start_gfn = cx;
> > > clog.count = max - cx;
> > > - clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + cx *
> > > len);
>
> and here we fill in the last pieces if there are any leftovers, which
> at this point are guaranteed to be smaller than len.
>
> > > + clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + cx);
> > > r = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS,
> > > &clog); if (r) {
> > > error_report("KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS failed: %s",
> > > strerror(-r));
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-15 16:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] s390x: fix storage attributes migration for non-small guests Claudio Imbrenda
2018-01-15 18:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-18 16:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-18 16:52 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-01-18 17:02 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-01-18 17:23 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-01-18 17:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-18 17:33 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-01-18 17:40 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180118180240.7d678384.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).