qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: implement the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper for LUKS driver
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:25:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119092516.GB16798@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11124de8-ece3-cad5-7e43-0b10ce5c097d@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:51:36PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 04:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > If the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper isn't provided, the qemu-img commit
> > command fails to re-open the base layer after committing changes into
> > it. Provide a no-op implementation for the LUKS driver, since there
> > is not any custom work that needs doing to re-open it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/crypto.c | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> I'm hoping another block-layer expert chimes in, as I'm not quite sure
> what the full reopen rules are; but the idea makes sense to me.

Yeah, likewise - it is hard to understand what is required, but I see
lots of other block drivers just put a no-op impl here. I'm relying on
Kevin/Max to tell me if i'm wrong here 

> > diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c
> > index 60ddf8623e..bb9a8f5376 100644
> > --- a/block/crypto.c
> > +++ b/block/crypto.c
> > @@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static void block_crypto_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
> >      qcrypto_block_free(crypto->block);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int block_crypto_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
> > +                                       BlockReopenQueue *queue, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +    /* nothing needs checking */
> 
> Are we sure that even changes such as moving from read-only to
> read-write need no checking?

LUKS doesn't do anything differently with ro vs rw images, so I'm assuming
any such checks are handled by the layer below.



> 
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * 1 MB bounce buffer gives good performance / memory tradeoff
> > @@ -620,6 +626,7 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
> >      .bdrv_truncate      = block_crypto_truncate,
> >      .create_opts        = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
> >  
> > +    .bdrv_reopen_prepare = block_crypto_reopen_prepare,
> >      .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> >      .bdrv_co_preadv     = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> >      .bdrv_co_pwritev    = block_crypto_co_pwritev,

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 10:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: implement the bdrv_reopen_prepare helper for LUKS driver Daniel P. Berrange
2018-01-18 19:51 ` Eric Blake
2018-01-19  9:25   ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2018-01-31 18:27 ` Max Reitz
2018-02-16 13:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-03-06 10:35   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-03-06 11:18 ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180119092516.GB16798@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).