qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcie-root-port: let it has higher migrate priority
Date: Thu,  1 Feb 2018 19:20:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180201112028.23552-1-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)

In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
priority order:

    IOMMU > PCI Devices

When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pcie-root-port, we'll always
migrate vIOMMU first, since pcie-root-port will be seen to have the same
priority of general PCI devices.

That's problematic.

The thing is that PCI bus number information is stored in the root port,
and that is needed by vIOMMU during post_load(), e.g., to figure out
context entry for a device.  If we don't have correct bus numbers for
devices, we won't be able to recover device state of the DMAR memory
regions, and things will be messed up.

So let's boost the PCIe root ports to be even with higher priority:

   PCIe Root Port > IOMMU > PCI Devices

A smoke test shows that this patch fixes bug 1538953.

CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
CC: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
CC: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
CC: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
CC: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
CC: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538953
Reported-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
Marcel & all,

I think it's possible that we need similar thing for other bridge-like
devices, but I'm not that familiar.  Would you help confirm?  Thanks,
---
 hw/pci-bridge/gen_pcie_root_port.c | 1 +
 include/migration/vmstate.h        | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/gen_pcie_root_port.c b/hw/pci-bridge/gen_pcie_root_port.c
index 0e2f2e8bf1..e6ff1effd8 100644
--- a/hw/pci-bridge/gen_pcie_root_port.c
+++ b/hw/pci-bridge/gen_pcie_root_port.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void gen_rp_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 
 static const VMStateDescription vmstate_rp_dev = {
     .name = "pcie-root-port",
+    .priority = MIG_PRI_PCIE_ROOT_PORT,
     .version_id = 1,
     .minimum_version_id = 1,
     .post_load = pcie_cap_slot_post_load,
diff --git a/include/migration/vmstate.h b/include/migration/vmstate.h
index 8c3889433c..491449db9f 100644
--- a/include/migration/vmstate.h
+++ b/include/migration/vmstate.h
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum VMStateFlags {
 typedef enum {
     MIG_PRI_DEFAULT = 0,
     MIG_PRI_IOMMU,              /* Must happen before PCI devices */
+    MIG_PRI_PCIE_ROOT_PORT,     /* Must happen before IOMMU */
     MIG_PRI_GICV3_ITS,          /* Must happen before PCI devices */
     MIG_PRI_GICV3,              /* Must happen before the ITS */
     MIG_PRI_MAX,
-- 
2.14.3

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-01 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 11:20 Peter Xu [this message]
2018-02-01 12:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcie-root-port: let it has higher migrate priority Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-02-01 19:18   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-02-01 19:48     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-02-01 20:01       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-02-01 20:10         ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-02-02 10:04         ` Peter Xu
2018-02-02 13:25           ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-02-01 19:38   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-02-02 10:19   ` Peter Xu
2018-02-01 19:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-02-02  9:56   ` Peter Xu
2018-02-02 12:39     ` Marcel Apfelbaum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180201112028.23552-1-peterx@redhat.com \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).