From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejstW-0007p3-Ua for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:34:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejstV-00043w-Vj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 15:34:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:33:57 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20180208223323-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180207042438.15422-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20180207042438.15422-11-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20180208194226-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180208221121-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 10/14] pci: Add support for Designware IP block List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrey Smirnov Cc: "open list:ARM" , Peter Maydell , Jason Wang , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Marcel Apfelbaum , QEMU Developers , Andrey Yurovsky On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:22:53PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:03:04PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > >> >> +#define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL 0x710 > >> >> + > >> >> +#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1 0x72C > >> >> +#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP BIT(4) > >> >> + > >> >> +#define PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL 0x80C > >> >> +#define PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE (0x1 << 17) > >> >> + > >> >> +#define PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO 0x820 > >> >> +#define PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI 0x824 > >> >> +#define PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE 0x828 > >> >> +#define PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK 0x82C > >> >> +#define PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS 0x830 > >> >> + > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT 0x900 > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND (0x1 << 31) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND (0x0 << 31) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2 (0x2 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1 (0x1 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0 (0x0 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_CR1 0x904 > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM (0x0 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO (0x2 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0 (0x4 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1 (0x5 << 0) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_CR2 0x908 > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_ENABLE (0x1 << 31) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_BAR_MODE_ENABLE (0x1 << 30) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE 0x90C > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE 0x910 > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_LIMIT 0x914 > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET 0x918 > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_BUS(x) (((x) >> 24) & 0xff) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_DEVFN(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0xff) > >> >> +#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C > > > > Can you avoid a PCIE prefix for this btw? > > > > That's how those constants were named in Linux kernel, but yeah, I'll > add a prefix to them. > > Thanks, > Andrey Smirnov In that case you should not copy it into your file. Stuff from linux kernel should be imported into standard-headers. -- MST