From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC/D] docs: document our stable process
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 14:11:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180209131112.2068-1-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
Some pointers on how to get a patch into stable.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
This probably needs more love, but I'd like to have at least _some_
kind of documentation.
Maybe this should also go into the wiki?
---
docs/stable-process.rst | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 docs/stable-process.rst
diff --git a/docs/stable-process.rst b/docs/stable-process.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2502823dc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/stable-process.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+QEMU and the stable process
+===========================
+
+QEMU stable releases
+--------------------
+
+QEMU stable releases are based upon the last released QEMU version
+and marked by an additional version number, e.g. 2.10.1. Occasionally,
+a four-number version is released, if a single urgent fix needs to go
+on top.
+
+Usually, a stable release is only done for the last released version.
+
+What should go into a stable release?
+-------------------------------------
+
+Generally, the following patches are considered stable material:
+- Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
+- Patches that fix regressions
+
+If you think the patch would be important for users of the current release
+(or for a distribution picking fixes), it is usually a good candidate
+for stable.
+
+
+How to get a patch into QEMU stable
+-----------------------------------
+
+There are various ways to get a patch into stable:
+
+* Preferred: Make sure that the stable maintainers are on copy when you send
+ the patch by adding
+
+ .. code::
+
+ Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
+
+ to the patch description. This will make git add the stable maintainers
+ on copy when your patch is sent out.
+
+* If a maintainer judges the patch appropriate for stable later on (or you
+ notify them), they will add the same line to your patch, meaning that
+ the stable maintainers will be on copy on the maintainer's pull request.
+
+* If you judge an already merged patch suitable for stable, send a mail
+ to ``qemu-stable@nongnu.org`` with ``qemu-devel@nongnu.org`` and appropriate
+ other people (like the patch author or the relevant maintainer) on copy.
+
+Stable release process
+----------------------
+
+When the stable maintainers prepare a new stable release, they will prepare
+a git branch with a release candidate and send the patches out to
+``qemu-devel@nongnu.org`` for review. If any of your patches are included,
+please verify that they look fine. You may also nominate other patches that
+you think are suitable for inclusion. After review is complete (may involve
+more release candidates), a new stable release is made available.
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 13:11 Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-02-12 3:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC/D] docs: document our stable process Michael Roth
2018-02-12 12:36 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180209131112.2068-1-cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).