From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52734)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1emhhV-0004Lm-L6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:13:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1emhhR-00051c-Ld
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:13:25 -0500
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:13:18 +0000
From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20180216151318.GH3181@redhat.com>
Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= <berrange@redhat.com>
References: <20180216121810.56ed961e.cohuck@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8nRr6OgJ0OAgk6xL2dXQVrUMod5kMzPufykjVNj-yNug@mail.gmail.com>
	<8b721785-5581-8936-2517-1fa00db3dabd@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA82O0HpZCa_sHJmwn7sH4HYE4NUAg0ni_Z2n_+d4JMAWQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA82O0HpZCa_sHJmwn7sH4HYE4NUAg0ni_Z2n_+d4JMAWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull requests
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:03:07PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 February 2018 at 14:53, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 16/02/2018 12:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 16 February 2018 at 11:18, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> The block folks are already doing this, so we should just
> >> formalize what they're doing at the moment I guess. From my point
> >> of view as long as there's something I can easily filter
> >> in/out in the email body or subject so I don't get confused
> >> (and which doesn't require me to update my filters every time
> >> a new subsystem switches to using submaintainer pulls!)
> >> I don't mind about the rest of it. Maybe a subject line with
> >> 'PULL SUBSYSTEM s390x' (ditto block, etc etc) ?
> >
> > What about just requiring you to be in the "To" or "Cc" fields?  That
> > works pretty well for Linux.
> 
> It would require existing submaintainers to change their process,
> though -- currently not all pull requests are to/cc me.

All this time I thought it was /already/ required to cc Peter on
pull requests !

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|