From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] s390x/sclp: clean up sclp masks
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:20:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221162005.77390824.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519152302-19079-3-git-send-email-imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:45:01 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Clean up SCLP masks: introduce an sccb_mask_t to be used for SCLP event
> masks instead of just unsigned int or uint32_t. This will allow later
> to extend the mask with more ease.
Looks mostly sane.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c | 4 ++--
> hw/char/sclpconsole.c | 4 ++--
> hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> hw/s390x/sclpcpu.c | 4 ++--
> hw/s390x/sclpquiesce.c | 4 ++--
> include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c b/hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c
> index c500bda..cc4d70a 100644
> --- a/hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c
> +++ b/hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> index 2414614..f6f28fd 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct SCLPEventFacility {
> SysBusDevice parent_obj;
> SCLPEventsBus sbus;
> /* guest' receive mask */
Let's make this "guest's", as you're touching the line right below.
> - unsigned int receive_mask;
> + sccb_mask_t receive_mask;
> /*
> * when false, we keep the same broken, backwards compatible behaviour as
> * before; when true, we implement the architecture correctly. Needed for
(...)
> @@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ static void copy_mask(uint8_t *dst, uint8_t *src, uint16_t dst_len,
>
> static void read_event_data(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb)
> {
> - unsigned int sclp_active_selection_mask;
> - unsigned int sclp_cp_receive_mask;
> + sccb_mask_t sclp_active_selection_mask = 0;
Why do you need to initialize this now?
> + sccb_mask_t sclp_cp_receive_mask;
>
> ReadEventData *red = (ReadEventData *) sccb;
>
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static void write_event_mask(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb)
> {
> WriteEventMask *we_mask = (WriteEventMask *) sccb;
> uint16_t mask_length = be16_to_cpu(we_mask->mask_length);
> - uint32_t tmp_mask;
> + sccb_mask_t tmp_mask = 0;
Same here.
>
> if (!mask_length || (mask_length > SCLP_EVENT_MASK_LEN_MAX) ||
> ((mask_length != 4) && !ef->allow_all_mask_sizes)) {
(...)
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h b/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> index 5119b9b..0a8b47a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h
> @@ -28,12 +28,14 @@
> #define SCLP_EVENT_SIGNAL_QUIESCE 0x1d
>
> /* SCLP event masks */
> -#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_SIGNAL_QUIESCE 0x00000008
> -#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_MSG_ASCII 0x00000040
> -#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_CONFIG_MGT_DATA 0x10000000
> -#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_OP_CMD 0x80000000
> -#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_MSG 0x40000000
> -#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_PMSGCMD 0x00800000
> +#define SCLPEVMSK(T) (1ULL << (sizeof(sccb_mask_t) * 8 - (T)))
SCLP_EVMASK() would be a bit more readable, I think.
> +
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_OP_CMD SCLPEVMSK(SCLP_EVENT_OPRTNS_COMMAND)
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_MSG SCLPEVMSK(SCLP_EVENT_MESSAGE)
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_CONFIG_MGT_DATA SCLPEVMSK(SCLP_EVENT_CONFIG_MGT_DATA)
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_PMSGCMD SCLPEVMSK(SCLP_EVENT_PMSGCMD)
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_MSG_ASCII SCLPEVMSK(SCLP_EVENT_ASCII_CONSOLE_DATA)
> +#define SCLP_EVENT_MASK_SIGNAL_QUIESCE SCLPEVMSK(SCLP_EVENT_SIGNAL_QUIESCE)
>
> #define SCLP_UNCONDITIONAL_READ 0x00
> #define SCLP_SELECTIVE_READ 0x01
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 18:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-20 18:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/3] s390x/sclp: proper support of larger send and receive masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-21 15:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-21 16:28 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-21 17:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-22 9:29 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-20 18:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] s390x/sclp: clean up sclp masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-21 15:20 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-02-21 16:42 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-21 17:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-22 9:29 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-20 18:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] s390x/sclp: extend SCLP event masks to 64 bits Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-21 15:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-21 16:51 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-21 17:33 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-21 15:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180221162005.77390824.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).