From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] numa: we don't implement NUMA for s390x
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:02:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227110255.20999-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Right now it is possible to crash QEMU for s390x by providing e.g.
-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1
Problem is, that numa.c uses mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props as an
indicator whether NUMA is supported by a machine type. We don't
implement NUMA for s390x ("topology") yet. However we need
mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props for query-cpus.
So let's fix this case by also checking for mc->get_default_cpu_node_id,
which will be needed by machine_set_cpu_numa_node().
qemu-system-s390x: -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1: NUMA is not supported by
this machine-type
While at it, make s390_cpu_index_to_props() look like on other
architectures.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 8 +++++---
numa.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 4abbe89847..1eff4a6274 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -388,12 +388,14 @@ static void s390_machine_device_unplug_request(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
}
}
-static CpuInstanceProperties s390_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *machine,
+static CpuInstanceProperties s390_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *ms,
unsigned cpu_index)
{
- g_assert(machine->possible_cpus && cpu_index < machine->possible_cpus->len);
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+ const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
- return machine->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu_index].props;
+ assert(cpu_index < possible_cpus->len);
+ return possible_cpus->cpus[cpu_index].props;
}
static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
index 7e0e789b02..103b93f5cb 100644
--- a/numa.c
+++ b/numa.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
return;
}
- if (!mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props) {
+ if (!mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props || !mc->get_default_cpu_node_id) {
error_report("NUMA is not supported by this machine-type");
exit(1);
}
--
2.14.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 11:02 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-02-27 11:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] numa: we don't implement NUMA for s390x Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 10:11 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227110255.20999-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).