From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] qemu-img: Drop BLK_ZERO from convert
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:17:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227161743.GC32480@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226170313.8178-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 06:03:13PM +0100, Max Reitz wrote:
> There are filesystems (among which is tmpfs) that have a hard time
> reporting allocation status. That is definitely a bug in them.
>
> However, there is no good reason why qemu-img convert should query the
> allocation status in the first place. It does zero detection by itself
> anyway, so we can detect unallocated areas ourselves.
>
> Furthermore, if a filesystem driver has any sense, reading unallocated
> data should take just as much time as lseek(SEEK_DATA) + memset(). So
> the only overhead we introduce by dropping the manual lseek() call is a
> memset() in the driver and a buffer_is_zero() in qemu-img, both of which
> should be relatively quick.
This makes sense. Which file systems did you test this patch on?
XFS, ext4, and tmpfs would be a good minimal test set to prove the
patch. Perhaps with two input files:
1. A file that is mostly filled with data.
2. A file that is only sparsely populated with data.
The time taken should be comparable with the time before this patch.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 17:03 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] qemu-img: Drop BLK_ZERO from convert Max Reitz
2018-02-27 16:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2018-02-28 18:08 ` Max Reitz
2018-02-28 20:11 ` Max Reitz
2018-02-28 20:23 ` Max Reitz
2018-03-06 13:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-03-06 17:37 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-03-07 15:57 ` Max Reitz
2018-03-07 16:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-07 17:11 ` Max Reitz
2018-03-07 17:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-03-07 17:22 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227161743.GC32480@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).