Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL-for-s390x 00/14] s390-ccw firmware update

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:56:48 +0000
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 26 February 2018 at 10:42, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Hi Cornelia!
> >
> > The following changes since commit 0a773d55ac76c5aa89ed9187a3bc5af8c5c2a6d0:
> >
> >   maintainers: Add myself as a OpenBSD maintainer (2018-02-23 12:05:07 +0000)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >   https://github.com/huth/qemu.git tags/s390-ccw-bios-2018-02-26
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 9c050f3d15697c4c84c9d6aa7af779a273b71d87:
> >
> >   pc-bios/s390: Rebuild the s390x firmware images with the boot menu changes (2018-02-26 11:10:30 +0100)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Boot menu patches by Collin L. Walling
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------  
> 
> I thought we'd agreed on 'PULL SUBSYSTEM whatever' rather than
> 'PULL-for-whatever' ?  I guess it doesn't matter much what
> convention we use but we should have one... My guess is that
> gmail's less-than-fantastic filtering functionality is going
> to be happier with a separate-words-phrase like 'PULL SUBSYSTEM'
> than a prefix-of-a-word like 'pull-for-', though.

Whatever works best... I'm happy with 'PULL SUBSYSTEM', as log as
there's s390x in it :)